London Gazette (Damons Post on Pasoti)

Yea Man wrote:

Frank Bullitt wrote:

I wonder what legal action has been threatened by Nikkk against loantalk.co.uk?

http://www.loantalk.co.uk/newsstory?id=1354&type=newsfeature&title=fes_trouble_in_paradise

After all, this is an industry website aimed at people with an interest in this sort of thing. The article is very negative about FES and uses the quote "incompetent lending".

And then we have ATD. A small website about a crap football team where a handful of people are discussing FES and whatever this administration/liquidation bollocks actually means. Libel lawyers up and down the land must be rubbing their hands in glee at the thought of being instructed in this case  

I wonder what moron would think that what is being discussed here is FAR more damaging then the article on loantalk.

Or this one for that matter:

http://www.mortgagestrategy.co.uk/first-european-securities-reassures-brokers-over-funding/181688.article

Where he funding coming from, Japan?

ejh wrote:

We have all been banned curiously as news emerges that nikkk's businesses are failing.

I remind you, how much personal abuse has IJN dished out over the years to Damon over his bankruptcies?

Apparently then it disqualified Damon from asking questions. He had no right and clearly no expertise. I wonder if he will be half as vile in his attitude to nikkk now he can't get any money or status out of him.

We really do need a "like" button on here   

To think, I was banned for bantering with Newell and calling him a faggot all those years ago. I don't think there is any doubt, Newell is a giver, not a taker.

Nool must be worried, if saint nik is out of the directors box so is he! lets hope he gets rid of all that fes crap disfiguring the ground on his way out! looks like the ego trip is over for the pair of them, lets hope speccy goes aswell before to long, and somebody who knows how to run a football club without the circus acts, takes over and puts this club back where it should be!

Mock Cuncher wrote:

Ian Newell wrote:

Whatever happens, I'm behind Nick Barron, and anyone that isn't can f*** off.

Nuff said.

Sufferedsince68 wrote:

Nool must be worried, if saint nik is out of the directors box so is he! lets hope he gets rid of all that fes crap disfiguring the ground on his way out! looks like the ego trip is over for the pair of them, lets hope speccy goes aswell before to long, and somebody who knows how to run a football club without the circus acts, takes over and puts this club back where it should be!

He will know doubt do his trademark and start slagging the bloke of ala stapleton, todd, damon and anyone else who he hasnt got a use for anymore.

Was it really worth the destruction of the fans favorite website?
Was is really worth causing such a divided fan base?
Was it really worth creating fictitious characters to destabilize the Fans Trust?
Was it really worth hacking a forum and closing it?
Was it really worth private investigators hired to spy on fellow fans?
Was it really worth the collecting of private information of fellow fans, for whatever reason?
Was it really worth spamming other fans web sites?
Was it really worth the dozens of legal threats to a fans website?
Was it really worth creating false Twitter accounts?
Was it really worth the thuggery by storming FOCP meetings?
Was it really worth losing good friends over?
Was it really worth losing what 'was' a good reputation?

Yea Man wrote:

........
Or this one for that matter:

http://www.mortgagestrategy.co.uk/first-european-securities-reassures-brokers-over-funding/181688.article

That one is over four years old.

While nool and his puppet delar, try to stiffle dissent on the farm and ban posters they dont like,it will just be filled with dunlop tugger tony and the fan fest dullards, all paying tribute to jimmy nik n nool, for their great work? its truly boring now, what will it be like without any dissenters to brent and co?

Jon B says this on the farm (only two paras from about six).



Over the last year though, I have seen, read & experienced much behaviour that has shocked me.

Fans' groups taking 'secret' legal advice on whether or not to sue fellow fans, vileness & abuse being posted anonymously on internet sites by people holding/having held senior positions in fans' groups, the near-gleeful sharing of information believed to be a 'smoking gun' (it wasn't) that could de-rail the Home Park planning process, personal online spats being reported to national racism bodies in an attempt to get the club into trouble, etc, etc.

Shocking & foul.

What upsets me most are the more considered attempts to destabilise Plymouth Argyle & it's current ownership.

From what I see (& I don't know what I don't know), these attempts to damage our club are being undertaken by people with extensive personal agendas, be it close relationships with previous owners, be it having idealist socialist ideals, or be it having had involvement with potential alternative bids to James Brent's (whether from Walter Mitty types or not). I understand that the Herald had some interesting contact/phone calls from people terrified that their involvement in late-in-the-day & fanciful attempts to stop JB taking us out of administration would become public.....

My reply,
Maybe you would like to enlarge on why we have two successful fans sites now Jon? To only focus on the fans divide when trying to ignore a story about the clubs sponsor speaks volumes. We hear how everybody is turned off by the glee expressed at Nikks trouble. No glee here but I do think that the story needs discussing. To pretend that nothing is happening because the latest court action happened behind closed doors is frankly laugable, it could and probably will have an impact on Argyle and as a fan I take an interest in this. If the facts of the story had been published and discussed when the story first broke it would have probably all been over by now but with the usual suspects trying to deny there is anything of interest to talk about it adds fuel to the flames. And right on queue we have the banning of EJH (who is obviously a marked man for being anti the clusterfuck) and Damon can't log on. I am not sure who you are talking about JON when mentioning reporting people for racism but when it comes to dirty tricks, legal threats and dirty dealing then look no further than your buddies at Pasoti, they started it and they're still at it.
The more you tell us there is nothing to see the more it piques my curiosity.

Anything that destabillies brent and his mini stand mess has my full support, the pompus back is just full of self importance, ask the lovely hooper, back,about his snooping on green jock? you speak for no one.

The nonentity 'B' speaks...so what.

GOB wrote:

The nonentity 'B' speaks...so what.

Slimy copper who, much the same as Hooper, used ATD purely as a charm offensive to garner votes for the PASB.

Wonder who the 'Socialists' are that he's slagging off?   

Blimey Slasher, you don't half like the sound of your own voice.   

Yea Man wrote:

Frank Bullitt wrote:

I wonder what legal action has been threatened by Nikkk against loantalk.co.uk?

http://www.loantalk.co.uk/newsstory?id=1354&type=newsfeature&title=fes_trouble_in_paradise

After all, this is an industry website aimed at people with an interest in this sort of thing. The article is very negative about FES and uses the quote "incompetent lending".

And then we have ATD. A small website about a crap football team where a handful of people are discussing FES and whatever this administration/liquidation bollocks actually means. Libel lawyers up and down the land must be rubbing their hands in glee at the thought of being instructed in this case  

I wonder what moron would think that what is being discussed here is FAR more damaging then the article on loantalk.

Or this one for that matter:

http://www.mortgagestrategy.co.uk/first-european-securities-reassures-brokers-over-funding/181688.article

But that article was in 2009 - might have to cut him some slack there!!

Bandwagon wrote:

Yea Man wrote:

Frank Bullitt wrote:

I wonder what legal action has been threatened by Nikkk against loantalk.co.uk?

http://www.loantalk.co.uk/newsstory?id=1354&type=newsfeature&title=fes_trouble_in_paradise

After all, this is an industry website aimed at people with an interest in this sort of thing. The article is very negative about FES and uses the quote "incompetent lending".

And then we have ATD. A small website about a crap football team where a handful of people are discussing FES and whatever this administration/liquidation bollocks actually means. Libel lawyers up and down the land must be rubbing their hands in glee at the thought of being instructed in this case  

I wonder what moron would think that what is being discussed here is FAR more damaging then the article on loantalk.

Or this one for that matter:

http://www.mortgagestrategy.co.uk/first-european-securities-reassures-brokers-over-funding/181688.article

But that article was in 2009 - might have to cut him some slack there!!

Just pointing out that was also bad press for FES yet remains on the internet for all to see.

The Grumpy Loyal
Post subject: FES in Financial Trouble?PostPosted: Sun Dec 22, 2013 10:43 pm
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 6:07 pm
IJN wrote:
.

So, no one is curtailing anything on this site, they never have and never will. Why you should hint at that is beyond me.


Grumpy Loyal wrote:
Am I allowed to disagree with this statement without it being moved to a locked supposed "trolling" thread on terraces?  :thumbs:


This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. Page 1


                    

Ian Newell has just posted a load of lies again on the farm. He says that he would sue for defamation of character only it would cost hundreds of thousands of pounds that he doesn't have, LOL you don't sue people because you have been caught out loads of times taking part in underhand stuff, blatantly disregarding the laws on data protection and you know damn well that people have copied your dossier on the freaks so that if you went to court you would get laughed right out of it.
There are probably about ten people left in the world who say that they believe what you say Ian, they are either completely stupid or they want the freebies you offer out to real fans.

He should ask Nikkk for a loan   

GOB wrote:

He should ask Nikkk for a loan   

I think he has had enough of him lol

Iggy wrote:

Ian Newell has just posted a load of lies again on the farm. He says that he would sue for defamation of character only it would cost hundreds of thousands of pounds that he doesn't have, LOL you don't sue people because you have been caught out loads of times taking part in underhand stuff, blatantly disregarding the laws on data protection and you know damn well that people have copied your dossier on the freaks so that if you went to court you would get laughed right out of it.
There are probably about ten people left in the world who say that they believe what you say Ian, they are either completely stupid or they want the freebies you offer out to real fans.

Oh dear, reckon he's clocked the pic!!  

Shirley there cant be a poster on the farm who believes a word nool says? Deepthroat? white feathers? mass expulsions for non brent lovers? its not a fans forum, its nools forum!

Do we need to drag up the megabytes of evidence yet again? Or is he playing his old diversionary trick for his pal Nikk?

What was Newell's racist comment?

ZYPH wrote:

You are right Tring.....I do mix up my 'Site' and 'Sight' at times...knowing full well which is which.

Also 'were' and 'where' I have mixed up as well.

I have no problems with 'bought' and 'brought' that some people have.

I'm sure that there/their are others......I put it down to age.

But I still have'nt seen it in Princerock's very good posts.

Here and hear seem to be a bit of a prob n'all.