Luke in on One Year Contract

Hugh Watt wrote:

What bothers me is why the feck have we signed him anyway

Zackly

You need two keepers, be interesting to see who is number one.

Two individuals I would like to see immediately removed from the club:

br*nt
McCormick

As a self-proclaimed socialist Freathy, I'm surprised to see you sounding so much like the Daily Mail on this McCormick issue,

I think it's almost impossible for drink drivers who kill due to their actions to get a licence back isn't it? Knew a fella who did the rehabilitation courses for drink drivers (not ones who caused harm or killed) and he said usually in those cases they always failed the test.....

GreenSam wrote:

As a self-proclaimed socialist Freathy, I'm surprised to see you sounding so much like the Daily Mail on this McCormick issue,

He was quite rightly sacked by the club when this first happened. He should stay sacked by the club. What the f*** is he doing back here? Never in a million years did I ever think Argyle would re-sign him! We don't owe him a living! And then there's the timing of the whole thing. It stinks.

Han Solos Other Ship wrote:

I think it's almost impossible for drink drivers who kill due to their actions to get a licence back isn't it? .

Er, no.

Certainly some sanctimonious, holier than thou, claptrappers on here.

He's a good young keeper who needs to earn a crust.

Having had time to think about this signing i've come to the conclusion that im going to trust the judgement of John Sheridan on this one solely.

Luke will divide opinion im not that happy he is back but that doesn't mean im against him making a living in football, after all he is reformed/rehabilitated and done his time sent down by the law so he is entitled too earn a wage in whatever career he chooses.

I just feel its crass to have him rejoin a club he was sacked from in the first place and i feel he would have been better off signing for another club but if John is prepared to take the flack and negative media Luke brings he must feel his ability warrants it so on a purely football basis i back John's judgement here but on a moral basis i hope it doesn't backfire.