The Mankover all action Thread.

Rickler wrote:

Hugh Watt wrote:

Rickler wrote:

TJOA wrote:

Let's hope it's more than just talk and rumours for once.

Yep, there's been a lot of uneaten popcorn in the recent past....

I always have a healthy scepticism when 'nothing' is announced except 'something I can't actually tell you'.

Why the secrecy?

I think we can at least agree the mankover is fecked?

We can?  Based on what?

The fact No contract has been signed with main contractor for a starter, despite being promised it would happen mid June. What’s the delay ?

Earwegoagain wrote:

The mankover will happen although obviously delayed, will Brent build his ice shed is fifty fifty I reckon and the rest of the crap won't happen.

No it won’t it’s fecked . Like his last plan.

Just out of intrest, does the current planning permission allow for the stand to be demolished and a complete and proper rebuild? Obviously we are at the point of no return with regards a real 21st century build - grasping at straws I know!!

Bandwagon wrote:

Just out of intrest, does the current planning permission allow for the stand to be demolished and a complete and proper rebuild? Obviously we are at the point of no return with regards a real 21st century build - grasping at straws I know!!

In a word no but we could just put in another application to build a proper stand. Fwiw I've always been in favour of a mankover because any new stand will be more akin to St James Park than what we have now.

Hugh Watt wrote:

Earwegoagain wrote:

The mankover will happen although obviously delayed, will Brent build his ice shed is fifty fifty I reckon and the rest of the crap won't happen.

No it won’t it’s fecked . Like his last plan.

I disagree Hallet is prepared to put in more money to get the refurb done but it will cost Brent his control of the club.

38 days until the first home game - Given the reduced entrance gates and inevitability that Argo will cock-up spectacularly, should we be arriving earlier this coming season for home games?

2020 is also looming fast - the date the shyster promised everything would be finished by, Mayflower celebrations and all that.

akagreengull wrote:

2020 is also looming fast - the date the shyster promised everything would be finished by, Mayflower celebrations and all that.

Well with the money to back them up spurs have built an entire new ground,in about a season

Should be able to knock off a mank over by then......

just need the cash

Grumpy Loyal in the Farmyard reacting to Clive Toms lame excuse as to why that fans forum was cancelled...

"That's some serious straw-clutching your doing there HC. If that were the case with the new CEO, why wouldn't the club just say that?

What is unequivocal, is that we are way past JB's hopeful main contract being signed date. Why aren't the club telling the fans why that is? Cancelling a forum, where that very question would obviously get asked, doesn't bode well for the current plan, does it? "

Newell feck off by the way

Did anyone manage to have a word with Brent and Wrathall at the Parkway game?

I wouldn't ask either of those two the way to amirillo.
What would be the point of such an exchange ?
I would however, harang them for what is clearly a problem. Dan didn't leave because of a pointless question, he left because he knew he wasn't wanted anymore and it was in his face. These matters are often solved by social action. Does anyone know of another nearby island that brent might be interested in. One that would satisfy his desire to balance his family money and end up with shedloads.

Looe Island?

As there were so few questions sent in to the club for the aborted fans' meeting, when can we expect answers? I'm expecting dreckly, shortly and imminently to feature.

Dingle wrote:

As there were so few questions sent in to the club for the aborted fans' meeting, when can we expect answers?  I'm expecting dreckly, shortly and imminently to feature.

It wasn't compulsory to send in your questions before the fans forum. The whole 'lack of interest' BS from the club just about sums the current regime's 'male it up as we go along' philosophy

It's the modern way. I really can't stress highly enough how pointless and counter productive these q and a things are. Just how many of them did the Oystons or their sort turn up to and laugh at the dummies.
Box ticking from the EFL. Not worth a light when push comes to shove.

What's happened to the development Blog's from Jon Back?
And the weekly updates from Greens on Screen?

BBC1 wrote:

What's happened to the development Blog's from Jon Back?
And the weekly updates from Greens on Screen?

Easy to work that out

beesrus wrote:

It's the modern way. I really can't stress highly enough how pointless and counter productive these q and a things are.

Says the man who makes much hay off Brent's answer to John Lloyds question about Brent buying Home Park off PCC.  

The answer from Brent, "that he hadn't thought about it," told us everything. That Brent is a liar would be the first thing. It's preposterous to think that after negotiating a deal with several options to buy the club back, that Brent hadn't given it any thought. It would be dereliction of his duty as Argyle Chairman not to give the idea thought.  If the question had never been asked, you (and I) would have been denied the pleasure of throwing the words back in his face.

Oh,  and we also learned that ATD is "Vile and Poisonous", and that the club owed the GT's 87.5K

Damn those boring, labourious and now "pointless" questions...

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

Looe Island?

Belongs to the Cornwall Wildlife Trust, thankfully................and doesn't need saving, brent style.

Rickler wrote:

Oh,  and we also learned that ATD is "Vile and Poisonous", and that the club owed the GT's 87.5K

Wow. This will change everything

Rickler wrote:

beesrus wrote:

It's the modern way. I really can't stress highly enough how pointless and counter productive these q and a things are.

Says the man who makes much hay off Brent's answer to John Lloyds question about Brent buying Home Park off PCC.  

The answer from Brent, "that he hadn't thought about it," told us everything. That Brent is a liar would be the first thing. It's preposterous to think that after negotiating a deal with several options to buy the club back, that Brent hadn't given it any thought.  It would be dereliction of his duty as Argyle Chairman not to give the idea thought.  If the question had never been asked, you (and I) would have been denied the pleasure of throwing the words back in his face.

Oh,  and we also learned that ATD is "Vile and Poisonous", and that the club owed the GT's 87.5K

Damn those boring, labourious and now "pointless" questions...

Just your usual pro Newell pro Brent pretentious pig shit then Rickler.......

Dingle wrote:

Did anyone manage to have a word with Brent and Wrathall at the Parkway game?

No, but the pair of them were stood 10 feet apart at Bolitho Park watching the game and they didn't even greet each other. Only difference is Harry Potter had his rentacops with him so any approach to him would have been met with the usual futility.
Oh and there was no sign of that fat slug Newell with him.

Bob Crow wrote:

Rickler wrote:

beesrus wrote:

It's the modern way. I really can't stress highly enough how pointless and counter productive these q and a things are.

Says the man who makes much hay off Brent's answer to John Lloyds question about Brent buying Home Park off PCC.  

The answer from Brent, "that he hadn't thought about it," told us everything. That Brent is a liar would be the first thing. It's preposterous to think that after negotiating a deal with several options to buy the club back, that Brent hadn't given it any thought.  It would be dereliction of his duty as Argyle Chairman not to give the idea thought.  If the question had never been asked, you (and I) would have been denied the pleasure of throwing the words back in his face.

Oh,  and we also learned that ATD is "Vile and Poisonous", and that the club owed the GT's 87.5K

Damn those boring, labourious and now "pointless" questions...

Just your usual pro Newell pro Brent pretentious pig shit then Rickler.......

Pay attention for christ sake....

"That Brent is a liar would be the first thing" Coz that's really pro Brent innit?

...and anyone who thinks I'm pro Newell after our history together needs their head examining.

Basically put... Bob Crow, you couldn't be more wrong if you tried.

Bob Crow wrote:

Rickler wrote:

beesrus wrote:

It's the modern way. I really can't stress highly enough how pointless and counter productive these q and a things are.

Says the man who makes much hay off Brent's answer to John Lloyds question about Brent buying Home Park off PCC.  

The answer from Brent, "that he hadn't thought about it," told us everything. That Brent is a liar would be the first thing. It's preposterous to think that after negotiating a deal with several options to buy the club back, that Brent hadn't given it any thought.  It would be dereliction of his duty as Argyle Chairman not to give the idea thought.  If the question had never been asked, you (and I) would have been denied the pleasure of throwing the words back in his face.

Oh,  and we also learned that ATD is "Vile and Poisonous", and that the club owed the GT's 87.5K

Damn those boring, labourious and now "pointless" questions...

Just your usual pro Newell pro Brent pretentious pig shit then Rickler.......

I really don't think Rickler could ever count as being pro Newell!