Here's where the change from mankover 4 million gone ( training pitches)

RegGreen wrote:

Spose he don’t care who he does buisness with let’s have it right he done business with Brent so he ain’t that choosey

makes sense to have it all at HP but does make you wonder why we didn't do it in the first place?

Greenskin wrote:

Didn't Stapes used to be involved in Goals? Bit of an odd statement to say that this represents a "superior solution" to Ernesettle-so why not go for it in the first place?

unless the club plan on building into goals from harpers park and redeveloping that land so they can have all the mod cons majority of clubs in championship have then i dont see how this is a great alternative to a new training ground. Its akin to the mankover in my eyes especially as harpers park is prone to flooding and thats not suddenly going to change. Plus comparing what we may have to clubs we want to be competiting against the whole thing is still too small and not attractive to ambitious players.

As you mention staplewallet wasnt their a big hoo haa with a cricket club when he bought it?

Angry wrote:

Greenskin wrote:

Didn't Stapes used to be involved in Goals? Bit of an odd statement to say that this represents a "superior solution" to Ernesettle-so why not go for it in the first place?

unless the club plan on building into goals from harpers park and redeveloping that land so they can have all the mod cons majority of clubs in championship have then i dont see how this is a great alternative to a new training ground. Its akin to the mankover in my eyes especially as harpers park is prone to flooding and thats not suddenly going to change. Plus comparing what we may have to clubs we want to be competiting against the whole thing is still too small and not attractive to ambitious players.

As you mention staplewallet wasnt their a big hoo haa with a cricket club when he bought it?

Apparently the old cricket ground site and bus storage area is not included in the package, just the Goals 5 a side pitches and a gym with changing rooms. All a bit strange really-propose to move to a site with the potential for at least a couple of full size pitches and with room to develop facilities, then cancel it and buy some 5 a side pitches instead. Doesn't seem very slanted towards an all singing, all dancing, championship standard player attracting project in all honesty.

Greenskin wrote:

Angry wrote:

Greenskin wrote:

Didn't Stapes used to be involved in Goals? Bit of an odd statement to say that this represents a "superior solution" to Ernesettle-so why not go for it in the first place?

unless the club plan on building into goals from harpers park and redeveloping that land so they can have all the mod cons majority of clubs in championship have then i dont see how this is a great alternative to a new training ground. Its akin to the mankover in my eyes especially as harpers park is prone to flooding and thats not suddenly going to change. Plus comparing what we may have to clubs we want to be competiting against the whole thing is still too small and not attractive to ambitious players.

As you mention staplewallet wasnt their a big hoo haa with a cricket club when he bought it?

Apparently the old cricket ground site and bus storage area is not included in the package, just the Goals 5 a side pitches and a gym with changing rooms. All a bit strange really-propose to move to a site with the potential for at least a couple of full size pitches and with room to develop facilities, then cancel it and buy some 5 a side pitches instead. Doesn't seem very slanted towards an all singing, all dancing, championship standard player attracting project in all honesty.

indeed sounds all a bit national league south you ask me somethink seems a bit dodgie ..plus building from harpers to goals cuts across to much park land to get to goals can’t see the council standing for that plus locals environmentalists as well there be uproar

Sigh and the gang are just looking to protect the money the club generates into real estate, PAFC piggy bank.

Earwegoagain wrote:

Sigh and the gang are just looking to protect the money the club generates into real estate, PAFC piggy bank.

it’s becoming a
Brent mk two ..the only difference it’s made to look more professional now ..but I hold my tongue till the jan window after that if nothing happens as far as im concerned it’s free for to be called out over there non investment in the team after all it’s a football club not a property vehicle for his Yankee chums

Earwegoagain wrote:

Sigh and the gang are just looking to protect the money the club generates into real estate, PAFC piggy bank.

Camara injured again. Ipswich fans think they've been sold a right crock.

You have to laugh don't you

Clodagh Rubbish wrote:

Earwegoagain wrote:

Sigh and the gang are just looking to protect the money the club generates into real estate, PAFC piggy bank.

Camara injured again. Ipswich fans think they've been sold a right crock.

You have to laugh don't you

If Argyle knew that Camara had an injury that would keep him out for the majority of the season then that would be good, ruthless business logic-in fact it would be poetic justice in a way for the wool they pulled over Argyle's eyes in the Mariner deal-what goes around comes around. If on the other hand Argyle were unaware of any long term injury to him then it would still be a very debatable point as to the wisdom of selling a major asset to a club highly likely to be a promotion rival. Seem to remember you pointing out in support of your opinion that Portsmouth sold Harness to Ipswich in pre season-looking at the relative league position of the 2 clubs and the rather toxic atmosphere at Fratton park on Saturday following their latest defeat then many of the Pompey faithful would possibly be questioning the wisdom of that deal.

Greenskin wrote:

Clodagh Rubbish wrote:

Earwegoagain wrote:

Sigh and the gang are just looking to protect the money the club generates into real estate, PAFC piggy bank.

Camara injured again. Ipswich fans think they've been sold a right crock.

You have to laugh don't you

If Argyle knew that Camara had an injury that would keep him out for the majority of the season then that would be good, ruthless business logic-in fact it would be poetic justice in a way for the wool they pulled over Argyle's eyes in the Mariner deal-what goes around comes around. If on the other hand Argyle were unaware of any long term injury to him then it would still be a very debatable point as to the wisdom of selling a major asset to a club highly likely to be a promotion rival. Seem to remember you pointing out in support of your opinion that Portsmouth sold Harness to Ipswich in pre season-looking at the relative league position of the 2 clubs and the rather toxic atmosphere at Fratton park on Saturday following their latest defeat then many of the Pompey faithful would possibly be questioning the wisdom of that deal.

I don't think any of us are laughing about the injuries to Galloway, Miller, Scarr or Azaz either. This Clodagh fella is a complete tool who seems to support the chairman over and above the team, Brenty bhey type foreshore.

Brenty bhey type person he’s not. Long way off.

Greenskin wrote:

Angry wrote:

Greenskin wrote:

Didn't Stapes used to be involved in Goals? Bit of an odd statement to say that this represents a "superior solution" to Ernesettle-so why not go for it in the first place?

unless the club plan on building into goals from harpers park and redeveloping that land so they can have all the mod cons majority of clubs in championship have then i dont see how this is a great alternative to a new training ground. Its akin to the mankover in my eyes especially as harpers park is prone to flooding and thats not suddenly going to change. Plus comparing what we may have to clubs we want to be competiting against the whole thing is still too small and not attractive to ambitious players.

As you mention staplewallet wasnt their a big hoo haa with a cricket club when he bought it?

Apparently the old cricket ground site and bus storage area is not included in the package, just the Goals 5 a side pitches and a gym with changing rooms. All a bit strange really-propose to move to a site with the potential for at least a couple of full size pitches and with room to develop facilities, then cancel it and buy some 5 a side pitches instead. Doesn't seem very slanted towards an all singing, all dancing, championship standard player attracting project in all honesty.

If that is indeed true then what is the point in buying goals i ask when we cant do anything to improve the facilities beyond what they are now. I was under the illusion we where buying that area and building the mod cons harpers park lacks while upgrading goals so we had an all weather pitch to train on and rented out the other pitches for the public.

If all we are doing is buy goals then very little to no improvement is going to be made that i can see.

[quote="mouldyoldgoat"]Brenty bhey type person he’s not. Long way off. [/quote

Spot on with the tool bit tho.

Earwegoagain wrote:

Sigh and the gang are just looking to protect the money the club generates into real estate, PAFC piggy bank.

Terminally deluded. Laughing stock in fact

Savageandstrand wrote:

Earwegoagain wrote:

Sigh and the gang are just looking to protect the money the club generates into real estate, PAFC piggy bank.

Terminally deluded. Laughing stock in fact

Excellent debate. Have you even read what Sigh and the gang are proposing now as opposed to the original Parkway plan? Doesn't make sense to a lot of people.

Angry wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

hmm!! How long sigh & his Yankee chums are gunna run as it as a separate commercial buisness then ??? Before they do anythink Argyle related keeping a eye on this one cos I think this stinks of somethink maybe it is all about putting Argyles money in land deals & infrastructure & feck all in the team so came January we’re soon know & if they don’t invest to the equivalent of what’s been going through the door or mug us of with a couple shit loans I will be the first to have a scream up to sigh the American investment company guy and his Yankee cronies

Love SI, fully support and trust Si, eight years of the Brentmare and his bumlicky disiples, taught me how to spot a wrong un, he's got my backing to do whats right for the club.

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

Love SI, fully support and trust Si, eight years of the Brentmare and his bumlicky disiples, taught me how to spot a wrong un, he's got my backing to do whats right for the club.

just trying to judge his character someone that done buisness with Brent in the first place what he didn’t check him out for one and was on Brent’s board for 2 years and didn’t say a word so I suspect he back him in the board room to 2 he finished Brent’s wank over and 3 when he did take control he put Brent’s daughter on the board
The club now is made to look more professionally run but there still doing land deals and a nice chunk of money has been invested but none seems to be going in the team like brent just saying im still trying to understand the kind of character sigh really is just saying