Purrington

Les Miserable wrote:

tigertony wrote:

He's gone!! Apparently he asked for a move so 'taxi' for Purr. No point in keeping him. Wouldn't surprise me if he asked to go when he heard that Truro were interested but they pulled out and he had to go to save face and Rover'am were the only takers.

Can it be a coincidence how you and Graiser always sing from the same hymn sheet?  Flak deflectors foreshore.

Beggar me Les, plenty on here sing from the same hymn sheet!

Freathy wrote:

Elias wrote:

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

X throbber and the top Toadie are both backing Green Jim, will they still be backing Brent when he cost us promotion again?........but of course!!!
It stinks, Brent undermines Adams once again.

What a shock !

They're not Argo supporters.  They're brent supporters.

We all know what Nool is! X throbber, is now claming the sale of Purrington,as another Jimmy Masterstroke like the sale of Hourihane, to Barnsley, rekons three hundred grand is a great price!!! no wonder the Banker Boyz take the piss.

Reality of Div 2 football.....three and half year contracts are not part of life.

It's Championship money that wins.....certainly not a downward mobile Rotherham.

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

Freathy wrote:

Elias wrote:

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

X throbber and the top Toadie are both backing Green Jim, will they still be backing Brent when he cost us promotion again?........but of course!!!
It stinks, Brent undermines Adams once again.

What a shock !

They're not Argo supporters.  They're brent supporters.

We all know what Nool is! X throbber, is now claming the sale of Purrington,as another Jimmy Masterstroke like the sale of Hourihane, to Barnsley, rekons three hundred grand is a great price!!! no wonder the Banker Boyz take the piss.

x throbber the same guy who moans about fans not going to games wile not going to games himself? he is just as clueless as the rest of the idiots who defend brent at every turn.

If we are an ambitious club with a goal of getting out of league 2 and aiming for the championship we should be keeping young talented players here and getting secured with a good contracts not selling them to the first chancer.

Judging by the reaction on all 3 sites, it may be just me but I thought he was average. Certainly nothing special, not a Connelly or Poole. I think Oscar is a better LB then Purrington or Sawyer.

If a player what's to go, better off getting rid. !

Graiser wrote:

Les Miserable wrote:

tigertony wrote:

He's gone!! Apparently he asked for a move so 'taxi' for Purr. No point in keeping him. Wouldn't surprise me if he asked to go when he heard that Truro were interested but they pulled out and he had to go to save face and Rover'am were the only takers.

Can it be a coincidence how you and Graiser always sing from the same hymn sheet?  Flak deflectors foreshore.

Beggar me Les, plenty on here sing from the same hymn sheet!

True enough Graiser, praaps you and Tone(along with zyph) being the exception to the rule tickles my tentacles.

True

Jon L wrote:

Judging by the reaction on all 3 sites, it may be just me but I thought he was average.  Certainly nothing special, not a Connelly or Poole.  I think Oscar is a better LB then Purrington or Sawyer.

Not far from my view in all truth. He has improved, no question about that, but whether he is consistently up to championship standard or is another Beswetherick remains to be seen. Two more pressing issues for me-Carey and Bradley MUST be retained, if either of those players are sold in this window then it would really be insurrection time. And should Argyle get promotion this season, then adequate funding from the fairly substantial income received over the last couple of years must be released to support DA in procuring the better players undoubtedly needed for progress at the higher level. If either of those criteria are not met, then surely even the stoutest board defender must realise that the club simply are not going to get anywhere under the stewardship of the present directorship?

Won't be holding my breath though.

I've never understood why players are allowed to come and go to another without so much as a by your leave, in fact they are almost praised for doing so.
And yet woe betide any spectator that turns colour. Can someone explain that to me ? Is there an unseen dynamic going on in the heads of some ? I'm a bit simple.

Les Miserable wrote:

Graiser wrote:

Les Miserable wrote:

tigertony wrote:

He's gone!! Apparently he asked for a move so 'taxi' for Purr. No point in keeping him. Wouldn't surprise me if he asked to go when he heard that Truro were interested but they pulled out and he had to go to save face and Rover'am were the only takers.

Can it be a coincidence how you and Graiser always sing from the same hymn sheet?  Flak deflectors foreshore.

Beggar me Les, plenty on here sing from the same hymn sheet!

True enough Graiser, praaps you and Tone(along with zyph) being the exception to the rule tickles my tentacles.

As long as it's not your testicles Les, I can live with that !

So we have two days to sign a left back then..

One day

23:00 tomorrow the window shuts. again del bhey has a very busy day finding a left back, that winger he is waiting to hear back on if not another while also getting the team ready to play yeovil.

Dane. wrote:

If a player what's to go, better off getting rid. !

Yep! If an employee of mine wanted out I would clear his locker out for him. I think his ability is summed up when the club making the offer are getting relegated and so far adrift they need Robinson Crusoe. He was not that good!

Argo going into the business end of the season in complete disarray -again. With an owner like brent who needs enemies.

They are hardly in disarray are they ?

The ink on the contract is still wet but the 38 page farm thread on the Purrington sell out has already been moved to 'Argyle old boys'........move along peeps, nothing to see hear

Well hopefully Adams was allowed to look for a replacement soon as he knew he was off what happened to the ross county left back >

Did he ask to go before or after he was aware that Rover'am were sniffing around? Either way the only tools we could use to get him to stay would be a longer contract and/or a pay rise. Pay rises come with success and at present this season we've achieved nothing. He asked to go and DA is not the sort to beg players to stay so ''au revoir''. I'm sure we'll see him next season.

Am sure Green Jimmy will have inserted a sell on clause. He's only just realised how lucrative they can be for doing sod all. Tis the Jimmy way....

tigertony wrote:

Dane. wrote:

If a player what's to go, better off getting rid. !

Yep! If an employee of mine wanted out I would clear his locker out for him. I think his ability is summed up when the club making the offer are getting relegated and so far adrift they need Robinson Crusoe. He was not that good!

If I were an ambitious owner, I'd want to know 'why' he prefers to go .

Do you not think we are going somewhere as a club ?
Do you not get a decent contract and better pay for success ?

He'll probably make the usual platitudes.........'I love the green army I do' etc etc etc but to leave for a club in freefall should tell you all you need to know about this PAFC.

Les Miserable wrote:

The ink on the contract is still wet but the 38 page farm thread on the Purrington sell out has already been moved to 'Argyle old boys'........move along peeps, nothing to see hear

Speaks volumes that. Sell a player for a Plymouth price on the day before the transfer window and move the thread so that Brent doesn't receive any flak.

14 hours to save the planet.

Shame he has gone, but that is football I suppose. He wanted to go, he made that clear apparently.

All Argyle can do is get on with gaining promotion from this dogshite league.