Pasoti scum at it again!

On the GT'S coach to portsmouth will they be operating a TABLE1 policy? or is that for the really important senior management superfans/forum despot type, important peoples coach?

It certainly looks like the Table numbering is unique to the Pasoti Tyrant.

Get a room you two!

I have been emailed a couple of times to say I'd be welcomed back but politely declined.

I'm very worried for our future if we don't get promoted. Bretonside is going ahead, we have no plans for growth and Mr Brent won't entertain sensible discussions about selling the club.

It has just dawned on me that my account was supposedly deleted but they have been able to send me emails.....

RWW wrote:

I have been emailed a couple of times to say I'd be welcomed back but politely declined.

I'm very worried for our future if we don't get promoted.  Bretonside is going ahead, we have no plans for growth and Mr Brent won't entertain sensible discussions about selling the club.

I am too. If we dont go up this year we will see the likes of Reid, Nelson and probably Hartley, Alessandra and McHugh leave which will hurt us the next season.

Brent as you say wont entertain sensible ideas to sell the club as its clear he wont invest in the club beyond building his clusterfuck and thats all but dead now.

It will be a interesting summer either way thats for sure.

Angry wrote:

RWW wrote:

I have been emailed a couple of times to say I'd be welcomed back but politely declined.

I'm very worried for our future if we don't get promoted.  Bretonside is going ahead, we have no plans for growth and Mr Brent won't entertain sensible discussions about selling the club.

I am too. If we dont go up this year we will see the likes of Reid, Nelson and probably Hartley, Alessandra and McHugh leave which will hurt us the next season.

Brent as you say wont entertain sensible ideas to sell the club as its clear he wont invest in the club beyond building his clusterfuck and thats all but dead now.

It will be a interesting summer either way thats for sure.

Ahh ..but he stands with the supporters in the away end, and then releases statement's on his own personal propaganda newspaper the Evening brown envelope.... that he enjoyed the experience (surrounded by his Toadies of course).

How anyone can get sucked in by this bullshit is beyond reason.

RWW wrote:

It has just dawned on me that my account was supposedly deleted but they have been able to send me emails.....

Spooky!

RWW wrote:

It has just dawned on me that my account was supposedly deleted but they have been able to send me emails.....

When I ''totally deleted'' this was the answer I got to my details being wiped.

[i]We no longer delete users in total.
There were so many instances of people attempting to come back using
different usernames.
You are de-activated you can no longer post and we have no interest whatsoever in any of your details.However should you ever attempt to re-register, we will know as the details that are kept will show up.[/i]


Seems yet again they can't tell the truth. Go get them! A bunch of lying feckers.

Failing to completely wipe your details from their database is in breach of data protection laws.

Especially as there is proof that Newell has kept private details in the past.

Its a feckin message board for a crap 4th division football team. Why do they feel the need to have such control over everyone who posts? Why does it matter if John Smith deletes his account and comes back as Willy Wonka? If the new account causes trouble then just ban them, but why keep the records of non banned posters?

Is it because Nool likes to intimidate people by using their real names? Or is it because it will mess up De Liars dossier with lots of duplications?

And they call us freaks.

Surely it isn't hard just to get or use a new email and register under different details?

I can sort of understand a database that would recognise troublesome IP adresses from certain suspects, but other than that there's no reason to keep people's details.

The only thing I did when I quit was make sure all the passwords for my email, twitter and facebook were changed, though do that every so often anyway.

Frank Bullitt wrote:

Its a feckin message board for a crap 4th division football team. Why do they feel the need to have such control over everyone who posts? Why does it matter if John Smith deletes his account and comes back as Willy Wonka? If the new account causes trouble then just ban them, but why keep the records of non banned posters?

Is it because Nool likes to intimidate people by using their real names? Or is it because it will mess up De Liars dossier with lots of duplications?

And they call us freaks.

Needle dick Nool, and Greenman delar, lovely people! white feathers for the dying, and threatening phone calls to woman. How Decent and Normal.

Josh Pope wrote:

Surely it isn't hard just to get or use a new email and register under different details?

I can sort of understand a database that would recognise troublesome IP adresses from certain suspects, but other than that there's no reason to keep people's details.

The only thing I did when I quit was make sure all the passwords for my email, twitter and facebook were changed, though do that every so often anyway.

IP addresses are just a rough guide and more times than not, completely spurius as to where they locate your position. Saying that, there are plenty of free tools out there to mask your IP, and that's not via a proxy server. I still post on Pisspoti now and then (even only to fish for a reaction!! ) PI De-Liar or should I say Greenman or Goal_Humpty_Leary, (another one of his multi's) hasn't got a fuuking clue.

And if you're reading this, well, I know for a fact you're reading this,  I'd like to thank you and your pathetic team of arse-licking, mug-selling, sycophantic, dung-munching, mono-celled, slack-jawed, frog-eyed, cock-gobbling thunder-kuunt cuntasauras's, for the daily entertainment your site provides to all of the free minds on this site.

UP THE ARGO-- YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Yea Man wrote:

Failing to completely wipe your details from their database is in breach of data protection laws.

Especially as there is proof that Newell has kept private details in the past.

Apparently not - Pisspotty claimed that being non-profit making it didn't apply so I asked the question on a more legal site. Grey area but just about OK. However when they start to use the info, as in this case, it must be a breach. I'll ask my top lawyer when he's back from the sweet shop.

tigertony wrote:

Yea Man wrote:

Failing to completely wipe your details from their database is in breach of data protection laws.

Especially as there is proof that Newell has kept private details in the past.

Apparently not - Pisspotty claimed that being non-profit making it didn't apply so I asked the question on a more legal site. Grey area but just about OK. However when they start to use the info, as in this case, it must be a breach. I'll ask my top lawyer when he's back from the sweet shop.

Asked the question to a friend of a friend who has knowledge of running websites. He recommended and said: contacting the web hosting provider for the site and report them for privacy violation. Hosting providers definitely don't want any potential lawsuits and are very sensitive to this issue.

Yea Man wrote:

tigertony wrote:

Yea Man wrote:

Failing to completely wipe your details from their database is in breach of data protection laws.

Especially as there is proof that Newell has kept private details in the past.

Apparently not - Pisspotty claimed that being non-profit making it didn't apply so I asked the question on a more legal site. Grey area but just about OK. However when they start to use the info, as in this case, it must be a breach. I'll ask my top lawyer when he's back from the sweet shop.

Asked the question to a friend of a friend who has knowledge of running websites.  He recommended and said: contacting the web hosting provider for the site and report them for privacy violation. Hosting providers definitely don't want any potential lawsuits and are very sensitive to this issue.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tt (on a advice site)
OK so far - but what if the site in question then use your email to contact you to ask if you wish to rejoin after you have asked for total deletion and they replied that they don't do that but will never use the info.

Answer - Then report them to The Information Commissioner's Office.

tigertony wrote:

Yea Man wrote:

tigertony wrote:

Yea Man wrote:

Failing to completely wipe your details from their database is in breach of data protection laws.

Especially as there is proof that Newell has kept private details in the past.

Apparently not - Pisspotty claimed that being non-profit making it didn't apply so I asked the question on a more legal site. Grey area but just about OK. However when they start to use the info, as in this case, it must be a breach. I'll ask my top lawyer when he's back from the sweet shop.

Asked the question to a friend of a friend who has knowledge of running websites.  He recommended and said: contacting the web hosting provider for the site and report them for privacy violation. Hosting providers definitely don't want any potential lawsuits and are very sensitive to this issue.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tt (on a advice site)
OK so far - but what if the site in question then use your email to contact you to ask if you wish to rejoin after you have asked for total deletion and they replied that they don't do that but will never use the info.

Answer - Then report them to The Information Commissioner's Office.

Creepy Nools been stalking me for weeks after getting my name from information stored on his dog shit website, its probably illegal but really quite sad, i find the cowardly turd funny not threatning but i can see why younger or vunerable people would be bothered by this, my advice to anyone thinking of joining a website controlled by Newell DONT!!! HE WILL USE YOUR PERSONEL INFORMATION AGAINST YOU! I fully expect to find him in my garden knicking my Yfronts off the washing line! a very damaged individual.

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

Creepy Nools been stalking me for weeks after getting my name from information stored on his dog shit website, its probably illegal but really quite sad, i find the cowardly turd funny not threatning but i can see why younger or vunerable people would be bothered by this, my advice to anyone thinking of joining a website controlled by Newell DONT!!! HE WILL USE YOUR PERSONEL INFORMATION AGAINST YOU! I fully expect to find him in my garden knicking my Yfronts off the washing line! a very damaged individual.

I hope you know you'd be within your rights to twat him over the barnet with a shovel.

That would feck the shovel up!

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

Creepy Nools been stalking me for weeks after getting my name from information stored on his dog shit website, its probably illegal but really quite sad, i find the cowardly turd funny not threatning but i can see why younger or vunerable people would be bothered by this, my advice to anyone thinking of joining a website controlled by Newell DONT!!! HE WILL USE YOUR PERSONEL INFORMATION AGAINST YOU! I fully expect to find him in my garden knicking my Yfronts off the washing line! a very damaged individual.

Put them on the line unwashed - that'll teach him.

That might be playing into his hands.

Hell lift the skids for DNA samples for the database.

I wish someone would stalk me, or libel me. I sot of feel left out. Still, I have the grandiose sum of £2.68 in my bank, I'm poor, would the libel court accept that? would they accept a scabby old collie as part payment?