pasoti Thread

Freaks is us, Freaks we is

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

I've heard that Newell hasn't so much as decided to get his account deleted (has this happened yet?) as been told from on high to stop posting.

By whom and on what grounds though? Is he now an employee subject to contractual obligations?

[quote="mouldyoldgoat"][quote="Greenjock"]

hairy j wrote:

Grumpy wrote:

hairy j wrote:

I've removed my image... someone quoted me though so it's still there. Apologies Mr Pedlar.

Afraid of being told off by your farm friends are we?

Absolutely terrified. I would publish the PM I just sent in response to the claim that we have two racist mods on this site and one who is clinically insane and we have three members who regularly post who've been ejected from Home Park and that the site is full of wankers but I won't publish that PM as that's private business between myself and my good friend who I might have mentioned on this thread earlier.

Pm it to me hairy. I'll have a bit of fun with it

Ejected from home park? I've been ejected from far better establishments than that, and I once spoke to some of the players! Does that mean I can do a brief synopsis now?

Mark pedlar, friend to the stars. Like a lower league Dane Bunney with a sheriff's badge.


Is this him Jock?

THE BRIEF SYNOPSIS KID

Bogsider wrote:

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

I've heard that Newell hasn't so much as decided to get his account deleted (has this happened yet?) as been told from on high to stop posting.

By whom and on what grounds though? Is he now an employee subject to contractual obligations?

Probably because he breaks the rules.

Tringreen wrote:

Bogsider wrote:

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

I've heard that Newell hasn't so much as decided to get his account deleted (has this happened yet?) as been told from on high to stop posting.

By whom and on what grounds though? Is he now an employee subject to contractual obligations?

Probably because he breaks the rules.

#

Oh goody, something else to get the teeth into

Bogsider wrote:

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

I've heard that Newell hasn't so much as decided to get his account deleted (has this happened yet?) as been told from on high to stop posting.

By whom and on what grounds though? Is he now an employee subject to contractual obligations?

By someone at the club. That's all I have been told. I dont know by who or why.

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

Bogsider wrote:

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

I've heard that Newell hasn't so much as decided to get his account deleted (has this happened yet?) as been told from on high to stop posting.

By whom and on what grounds though? Is he now an employee subject to contractual obligations?

By someone at the club. That's all I have been told. I dont know by who or why.

Stating the obvious here (nothing new innit) but if that's the case, then it suggests (or do I mean confirms?):

(a) that Newell's got some position at the club*

(b) that the official stance is to let him (and, by implication, others) get up to whatever they want and then to assist in covering up the dodgy bits

*To those who keep suggesting that people are jealous, I'm sure I'm not the only one who's motivated not by jealousy (what of?) but by deep concern for what's going on, what's been going on, and what these goings on mean for the club that used to be ours.

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

Bogsider wrote:

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

I've heard that Newell hasn't so much as decided to get his account deleted (has this happened yet?) as been told from on high to stop posting.

By whom and on what grounds though? Is he now an employee subject to contractual obligations?

By someone at the club. That's all I have been told. I dont know by who or why.

I also have reason to believe this is true.

Frank Bullitt wrote:

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

Bogsider wrote:

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

I've heard that Newell hasn't so much as decided to get his account deleted (has this happened yet?) as been told from on high to stop posting.

By whom and on what grounds though? Is he now an employee subject to contractual obligations?

By someone at the club. That's all I have been told. I dont know by who or why.

I also have reason to believe this is true.

My guess is that him and his antics are acutely embarassing to the club and he's been told to STFU. They are probably shit-scared that he's copied all the documents, texts and emails and could plaster them all over Flickr and so they cant do much else.

Peggy wrote:

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

Bogsider wrote:

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

I've heard that Newell hasn't so much as decided to get his account deleted (has this happened yet?) as been told from on high to stop posting.

By whom and on what grounds though? Is he now an employee subject to contractual obligations?

By someone at the club. That's all I have been told. I dont know by who or why.

Stating the obvious here (nothing new innit) but if that's the case, then it suggests (or do I mean confirms?):

(a) that Newell's got some position at the club*

(b) that the official stance is to let him (and, by implication, others) get up to whatever they want and then to assist in covering up the dodgy bits

*To those who keep suggesting that people are jealous, I'm sure I'm not the only one who's motivated not by jealousy (what of?) but by deep concern for what's going on, what's been going on, and what these goings on mean for the club that used to be ours.

This makes me laugh too. We're not all like Mark Pedlar looking enviously at the Director's Box. I'd rather sit on my thumb than in there, I don't drive so have no need of a car park pass and much as I'd love a shiny Argyle tie to go with my parka, the greens would clash.

I also don't hanker to not be recognised in Jolly Jacks so have to wear my Argyle lanyard, and tell the fellow diners that I'm Mr Argyle who saved the club single-handedly.

I wouldn't mind mixing with the chuckle brothers though. They're crazy guys who get up to allsorts. Life's never dull when they're around.

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

Frank Bullitt wrote:

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

Bogsider wrote:

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

I've heard that Newell hasn't so much as decided to get his account deleted (has this happened yet?) as been told from on high to stop posting.

By whom and on what grounds though? Is he now an employee subject to contractual obligations?

By someone at the club. That's all I have been told. I dont know by who or why.

I also have reason to believe this is true.

My guess is that him and his antics are acutely embarassing to the club and he's been told to STFU. They are probably shit-scared that he's copied all the documents, texts and emails and could plaster them all over Flickr and so they cant do much else.

Well he does have a reputation for such things. It's getting darker by the minute, how interesting!

I spent the night in hospital Friday and didn't catch up but the rebirth of Pasoti? Really? Comes across to me as another attempt to bury all this nonsense rather than he it out in the open. Oh well, I expected nothing less. It's a shame though, there's one good people on the Pasoti mod team but a couple seem to be stronger willed than others.

It's not rebirth at all is it. Its sweeping it under the carpet. They must be really desperate to protect the 4th Deep Throater. We can only speculate as to who it might be but it must be one of either Graham Clark, Chris Webb, James Brent or Peter Jones. Nobody else would be protected so completely.

I'm sure all will become clear in time!

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

It's not rebirth at all is it. Its sweeping it under the carpet. They must be really desperate to protect the 4th Deep Throater. We can only speculate as to who it might be but it must be one of either Graham Clark, Chris Webb, James Brent or Peter Jones. Nobody else would be protected so completely.

It's no way shape or form graham. He widely condemned the dt episode and tbh wouldn't stoop that low, hard to believe there are people with integrity around but graham is just that.

I'm surprised you don't know, MrRapson

shonbo wrote:

I'm surprised you don't know, MrRapson

Was never party to it or part of it.

OK, I'll accept your word on that. I just seem to recall when I was asking questions about this and other stuff (which were never answered) on Pasoti, you seemed to be sticking a lot closer to the corporate pasoti line and against the trust.

Seems you're coming over to the dark side ???



GJ enjoys a refreshing mug of cider

Nothing to do with the dark side. I attacked the rust at the time. I now think its better balanced and has more chance of success. It didn't at the time and that was obvious. I've had conversations with Tim and John and they know why I was digging. End of story.

I enjoy poring of both sites tbh.

Don't use his first name it's very pasoti

I have also heard the rumours he has been told to get off the internet.

Does that include twitter and hiding your online status on Pasoti?

If I had to choose on who were the more honourable group it would be the Trust.....PASB I wouldn't go near with a barge pole, are they all freely elected.....I have been trying to find out.....and keep being side stepped.

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

It's not rebirth at all is it. Its sweeping it under the carpet. They must be really desperate to protect the 4th Deep Throater. We can only speculate as to who it might be but it must be one of either Graham Clark, Chris Webb, James Brent or Peter Jones. Nobody else would be protected so completely.

I'm sure I saw someone say that Graham's posts on pasoti were now showing as 'Guest' posts. Has he closed his account?

peggys point a) is correct i feel.
for the same reason maybe Webb too ?

both probably told to stop posting but make it look good.
comments left on EH website may well have been passed to the club heirarcy.

i think clubs fans base now takes a number of forms-

1 those just grateful for a club
2 those unhappy at our continued struggle but still go
3 those who cant be arsed until 'glory' returns.
4 those who expect brent to spend but know he wont & these are the ones who are dropping away after every defeat.

Andy_Symons wrote:

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

It's not rebirth at all is it. Its sweeping it under the carpet. They must be really desperate to protect the 4th Deep Throater. We can only speculate as to who it might be but it must be one of either Graham Clark, Chris Webb, James Brent or Peter Jones. Nobody else would be protected so completely.

I'm sure I saw someone say that Graham's posts on pasoti were now showing as 'Guest' posts. Has he closed his account?

Yes, he has.

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

Bogsider wrote:

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

I've heard that Newell hasn't so much as decided to get his account deleted (has this happened yet?) as been told from on high to stop posting.

By whom and on what grounds though? Is he now an employee subject to contractual obligations?

By someone at the club. That's all I have been told. I dont know by who or why.

If that's true, I guess it means that ATD is regularly read by 'the club' and has been effective in exposing unacceptable behaviour by El Pres & Mr Newell.

Does that mean the work is over?