Incoming!

Tringreen wrote:

So Peggy wrote an article for the programme as usual ?

It was pulled before printing and she has been dropped ?

What was the content of the article ?

No.

Peggy was asked, as she has been for the last eight years, to write a series of history pieces.

Obviously Dane can fill in the rest of the details.

No. I can't fill in the rest , I just said that I was told ages ago that you were gonna get dropped from the programme, no need to be sarky or bitter

Can't stand all this cloak n dagger stuff.

Why can't people just say what they mean and mean what they say ffs !

It's not cloak and dagger. I was having a conversation by text months ago now and they told me then that Peggy has a surprise coming her way , at this point I didn't even know Peggy wrote in the programme. It was then I was told that her section in the programme was gonna be dropped

I can't remember who I'd have to search back through my phone

Peggy wrote:

Tringreen wrote:

So Peggy wrote an article for the programme as usual ?

It was pulled before printing and she has been dropped ?

What was the content of the article ?

No.

Peggy was asked, as she has been for the last eight years, to write a series of history pieces.

Obviously Dane can fill in the rest of the details.

Peggy,

Sorry to hear what happen to you, I never did buy the program although the wife brought it yesterday to find out the new players names.

I hope that you could have these series of history pieces put on to this web sites on Fridays.

No need for sympathy, T&G, but thanks anyway.

The real question is how Dane and yesterday's little visitor know so much more than I do about all this.

Peggy wrote:

No need for sympathy, T&G, but thanks anyway.

The real question is how Dane and yesterday's little visitor know so much more than I do about all this.

Part of the answer may be that yesterday's little visitor and Dane share the same DNA.

Can't for the life of me think why this matter should have been common currency for text banter between mates months ago. How shallow are these people that they have to do something and also let people know they are doing something. Bankrupt of morality and common decency I would say.

Of course it's all done in the shadows so as not to pollute public perception. Just shocking.

Dougie wrote:

Can't for the life of me think why this matter should have been common currency for text banter between mates months ago. How shallow are these people that they have to do something and also let people know they are doing something. Bankrupt of morality and common decency I would say.

Of course it's all done in the shadows so as not to pollute public perception. Just shocking.

How people can behave in such an amoral fashion yet continually try to claim the moral high ground is astounding.

Careful Tring, don't want those gentle souls to complain of more internet bullying.

Andy_Symons wrote:

Peggy wrote:

No need for sympathy, T&G, but thanks anyway.

The real question is how Dane and yesterday's little visitor know so much more than I do about all this.

Part of the answer may be that yesterday's little visitor and Dane share the same DNA.

Wrong as always , yesterdays visitor I know nothing about. I was in camleford with my own team ,

So Dane, did you hear that it was Webb and Newell that had something to do with Peggy's article being pulled?

Is that what you want to say but are to scared to do it under your own name on here?

Andy_Symons wrote:

Peggy wrote:

No need for sympathy, T&G, but thanks anyway.

The real question is how Dane and yesterday's little visitor know so much more than I do about all this.

Part of the answer may be that yesterday's little visitor and Dane share the same DNA.

It's a shame they didn't share the same IP address because it would've been the reason we needed to kick his arse goodbye

Saltash green wrote:

Andy_Symons wrote:

Peggy wrote:

No need for sympathy, T&G, but thanks anyway.

The real question is how Dane and yesterday's little visitor know so much more than I do about all this.

Part of the answer may be that yesterday's little visitor and Dane share the same DNA.

Wrong as always , yesterdays visitor I know nothing about. I was in camleford with my own team ,

Oh thats ok then. Obviously I unreservedly apologise for suggesting that you may still be behaving in the way that you've always behaved on Argyle internet forums. I also withdraw any suggestion that you're doing on ATD what you once told me you did on pasoti - ie setting up multiple usernames via proxys and trolling the boards, sometimes holding conversations with yourself via multiple usernames in order to cause disruption and trouble. obviously you'd never, ever, ever do that (Cub's honour, guv) and we should ignore your long and inglorious history of demented trolling, abuse and associated moronic behaviour.

Sorry.

Oh yeah, and I'll remember to steer clear of Camelford. Any town that doesn't possess any internet access or mobile phone signal must be a hellhole.

You clearly are very special if you think I'm gonna be at football dealing my team yet sat there on the Internet winding up baffoons like you. Havnt you got meat to sell ?

Saltash green wrote:

You clearly are very special if you think I'm gonna be at football dealing my team yet sat there on the Internet winding up baffoons like you. Havnt you got meat to sell ?

Ooh, get her. And if you're going to try and insult me, at least get it right ; It's Buffoon, you buffoon.

Ha your funny,

Saltash green wrote:

Ha your funny,

Just for consistency - it's 'you're', not 'your'.

Happy to help

Saltash green wrote:

It's not cloak and dagger. I was having a conversation by text months ago now and they told me then that Peggy has a surprise coming her way , at this point I didn't even know Peggy wrote in the programme. It was then I was told that her section in the programme was gonna be dropped

I can't remember who I'd have to search back through my phone

Have you checked your phone yet? Normally takes me a couple of minutes.

Nick Wall wrote:

Saltash green wrote:

It's not cloak and dagger. I was having a conversation by text months ago now and they told me then that Peggy has a surprise coming her way , at this point I didn't even know Peggy wrote in the programme. It was then I was told that her section in the programme was gonna be dropped

I can't remember who I'd have to search back through my phone

Have you checked your phone yet? Normally takes me a couple of minutes.

If you want to save any credibility Dane, it'd do you the world of good to check your phone and reveal exactly who it was that did this.

It's not like you even like Newell now is it? Surely not?

Or are you one of his poodles now to?

No I haven't. I will do soon, I have an idea who I think it was!!

Saltash green wrote:

No I haven't. I will do soon, I have an idea who I think it was!!

Wel done Sherlock, I'm moist with anticipation.

Well get a wet wipe and get other it

It nearly makes sense!

Any luck yet on who told you or is it going to be another Mr Pres and his ip saga.

Yea Man wrote:

So Dane, did you hear that it was Webb and Newell that had something to do with Peggy's article being pulled?

Is that what you want to say but are to scared to do it under your own name on here?

To be honest Yea man... After these earlier postings...

Yea Man wrote:

Dougie wrote:

There was a thread with some comments but for the life of me I can't see it anymore. Has it been moved?

It's been moved for the time being to the archive.

The post was made by yet another poodle posting from a proxy, with the same IP as another recent troll.

While what he posted seems to be true, the thread also contained posts from him that could cause legal grief for the forum if it turns out he was on a wind up.

The post was also potentially going to cause further upset to Peggy so was removed for the time being.

I thought ATD did not want Newell and Webb named for fear of having to put up with the tedious bollox of having to deal with Newell and yet anouther of his faux lawsuit threats?

However... Even if these two instigated having Peggy dropped from the programme, they certainly didn't have the authority to carry it out.

That person is yet to be named.