Mankover Planning application submitted

If Argyle are ever going to become a professional football team again they will have to bring their training facilities up to date. Yes, we have a lovely new fence but I am not sure that's enough. If only the club owned some land where they could build a gym, indoor training facilities etc etc.

If only.

P.O.I wrote:

Good grief. I see Greenthing over on Pigstonia's portal of pigfuckery is bringing the Ivor Dewdney pasty vans into the dispute re retail food outlets. LOL.

   

    what a dimlow that greening geezer

BBC1 wrote:

Homeslice wrote:

The latest winning argument on Pasoti. Mod 'Green Thing' pondering why it is people are opposed to the food and drink outlets being built next to the ground when they don't object to the little Dewdneys van parked up on Outland Road.

The stupid is strong with that one.

Is he not related to another poster on there?

Ian Newell and Ian De Liars secret love child?

Yea Man wrote:

Andy S has stepped down as a mod, he will now resume moderating from one of the pseudonym mod accounts on pasoti.

Yep. Think we should play spot the Andy Soper psuedo mod account. Should be easy enough. Angry Andy posts all degenerate into child like hissy fits when he is challenged on even the most trivial of posts.

I saw his "orgasm" post to GC, as I'm in a similar time zone to him, and read it before piggy deleted it. It was noticeable only because it was utterly lame in every respect.

seadog wrote:

Daz cleans everything whiter than white.

Hugh Watt wrote:

Homeslice wrote:

If this planning application does get red carded I think the tipping point will be the fact that Hallett was prepared to fund the Grandstand, the planned refurbishment was broadly welcomed and seen as a step forward - and importantly, an achievable step forward - yet for reasons I don't think make sense to anyone except Brent and Newell, Brent has put the whole Grandstand development in jeopardy by tying in the application for his own personal developments. If the Grandstand had been left as a stand alone project, none of his would have been an issue.
I'm already hearing that other directors are seriously unhappy with Brent's actions. If the planning application gets 86'd I'd imagine Hallett will be incandescent.

I said at the time that I thought Brent was being sneaky by tieing his horseshit on a perfectly straightforward cash backed refurb of a PAFC asset. He really is an arsehole that clearly doesn't have the clubs best interests at heart.

Agree with that. Its not even subtle either.

Pcc will probably drop kick the whole thing into space. That will be a shame for the refurb and those who want the mankover done. The flip side in that eventuality, is it will be clear to everyone, even Nools mythical silent majority, that it is 100% Brent's fault.

Earwegoagain wrote:

BBC1 wrote:

Homeslice wrote:

The latest winning argument on Pasoti. Mod 'Green Thing' pondering why it is people are opposed to the food and drink outlets being built next to the ground when they don't object to the little Dewdneys van parked up on Outland Road.

The stupid is strong with that one.

Is he not related to another poster on there?

Ian Newell and Ian De Liars secret love child?

No mate.
I believe the link is Greening!

nzgreen wrote:

Yea Man wrote:

Andy S has stepped down as a mod, he will now resume moderating from one of the pseudonym mod accounts on pasoti.

Yep. Think we should play spot the Andy Soper psuedo mod account. Should be easy enough. Angry Andy posts all degenerate into child like hissy fits when he is challenged on even the most trivial of posts.

I saw his "orgasm" post to GC, as I'm in a similar time zone to him, and read it before piggy deleted it. It was noticeable only because it was utterly lame in every respect.

I too saw it and the thankfully swift response of many posters pointing out how low that post was, even given AA's history of posts. says a lot for the cleansing department that following these exchanges the page count was up to 12, once the cleansing had taken place was back to 10!

Upside down Andy and the other hand picked zealots of napoleon's farm,must be some sort of janner splinter group of the Plymouth Brethren. Home Park and more importantly, whoever has the keys, is their church.

PS Bucket Sue's photo 27 on GOS. You have to laugh..............

Yea Man wrote:

Ian Newells address was not "allowed" by ATD and nor was it a screenshot, not like him to be wrong.

But I'd also like to point out that it was obviously ok for Mr Newell to have the address of an ATD poster on his publicly accessible flickr account, to which that poster had not given permission for him to do so.  

Nor did PT post it anywhere for that matter just going on record for the fuvkwit who approached a BM here at the match threatening doom and gloom in my direction.

I only saw 1 address posted which had been copied from the PCC page and then copied in here with a bit of a joke about living in a nicer house or something.

That post was not from Paul Thomas and was condemned by 2 posters and removed by me.

I've heard about these threats and it's all a bit sad and pathetic really from grown men, the address was clearly visible to anyone who views the PCC portal! Doesn't condone the posting of it here as it's a bit of a silly thing to do but jeez come on!

But it perfectly fine to have the personals details of many other people stored on a Flickr account I guess.

Yea Man wrote:

I only saw 1 address posted which had been copied from the PCC page and then copied in here with a bit of a joke about living in a nicer house or something.

That post was not from Paul Thomas and was condemned by 2 posters and removed by me.

I've heard about these threats and it's all a bit sad and pathetic really from grown men, the address was clearly visible to anyone who views the PCC portal! Doesn't condone the posting of it here as it's a bit of a silly thing to do but jeez come on!

But it perfectly fine to have the personals details of many other people stored on a Flickr account I guess.

I now know who it was (along with Newells involvement) who approached the BM here during the match. Blocked the fella some 18 months ago for continued threats. Filed appropriate Police report half hour ago. K E M S if you think I'm joking. The culprit knows meaning. Pretty stupid to leave your photo on display !

harvetheslayer wrote:

Yea Man wrote:

I only saw 1 address posted which had been copied from the PCC page and then copied in here with a bit of a joke about living in a nicer house or something.

That post was not from Paul Thomas and was condemned by 2 posters and removed by me.

I've heard about these threats and it's all a bit sad and pathetic really from grown men, the address was clearly visible to anyone who views the PCC portal! Doesn't condone the posting of it here as it's a bit of a silly thing to do but jeez come on!

But it perfectly fine to have the personals details of many other people stored on a Flickr account I guess.

I now know who it was (along with Newells involvement) who approached the BM here during the match. Blocked the fella some 18 months ago for continued threats. Filed appropriate Police report half hour ago. K E M S if you think I'm joking. The culprit knows meaning. Pretty stupid to leave your photo on display !

Sorry Harve - are you saying you've / your mate's been threatened for objecting to the planning application, or for allegedly (it wasn't you) posting Newell's address on here, or both?

(And if it's because of the address thing, the irony is that certain individuals will have been filing those details away in their dossiers)

harvetheslayer wrote:

Yea Man wrote:

Ian Newells address was not "allowed" by ATD and nor was it a screenshot, not like him to be wrong.

But I'd also like to point out that it was obviously ok for Mr Newell to have the address of an ATD poster on his publicly accessible flickr account, to which that poster had not given permission for him to do so.  

Nor did PT post it anywhere for that matter just going on record for the fuvkwit who approached a BM here at the match threatening doom and gloom in my direction.

BM?

Breast man?

Peggy wrote:

harvetheslayer wrote:

Yea Man wrote:

I only saw 1 address posted which had been copied from the PCC page and then copied in here with a bit of a joke about living in a nicer house or something.

That post was not from Paul Thomas and was condemned by 2 posters and removed by me.

I've heard about these threats and it's all a bit sad and pathetic really from grown men, the address was clearly visible to anyone who views the PCC portal! Doesn't condone the posting of it here as it's a bit of a silly thing to do but jeez come on!

But it perfectly fine to have the personals details of many other people stored on a Flickr account I guess.

I now know who it was (along with Newells involvement) who approached the BM here during the match. Blocked the fella some 18 months ago for continued threats. Filed appropriate Police report half hour ago. K E M S if you think I'm joking. The culprit knows meaning. Pretty stupid to leave your photo on display !

Sorry Harve - are you saying you've / your mate's been threatened for objecting to the planning application, or for allegedly (it wasn't you) posting Newell's address on here, or both?

(And if it's because of the address thing, the irony is that certain individuals will have been filing those details away in their dossiers)

Correct simple as. I haven't divulged the Board Member (BM) here but if he wants to PM you fine by me

I was threatened not the BM who told me. Supposedly I revealed 2 addresses online (somewhere) completely untrue. Newell was mentioned and the other individual I now know who it was. So do the Boys in Blue now.... log 291/1009.....feel free

Edited Peggy yes my address is listed on Planning Portal. What was surprising is the female PC said she thought that would break data protection to which I replied no idea but they have to have real name address when they verify otherwise the obvious 100 objection or 100 in favour listings from Mickey Mouse etc....she still said it broke data protection !

harvetheslayer wrote:

Peggy wrote:

harvetheslayer wrote:

Yea Man wrote:

I only saw 1 address posted which had been copied from the PCC page and then copied in here with a bit of a joke about living in a nicer house or something.

That post was not from Paul Thomas and was condemned by 2 posters and removed by me.

I've heard about these threats and it's all a bit sad and pathetic really from grown men, the address was clearly visible to anyone who views the PCC portal! Doesn't condone the posting of it here as it's a bit of a silly thing to do but jeez come on!

But it perfectly fine to have the personals details of many other people stored on a Flickr account I guess.

I now know who it was (along with Newells involvement) who approached the BM here during the match. Blocked the fella some 18 months ago for continued threats. Filed appropriate Police report half hour ago. K E M S if you think I'm joking. The culprit knows meaning. Pretty stupid to leave your photo on display !

Sorry Harve - are you saying you've / your mate's been threatened for objecting to the planning application, or for allegedly (it wasn't you) posting Newell's address on here, or both?

(And if it's because of the address thing, the irony is that certain individuals will have been filing those details away in their dossiers)

Correct simple as. I haven't divulged the Board Member (BM) here but if he wants to PM you fine by me

I was threatened not the BM who told me. Supposedly I revealed 2 addresses online (somewhere) completely untrue. Newell was mentioned and the other individual I now know who it was. So do the Boys in Blue now.... log 291/1009.....feel free

Edited Peggy yes my address is listed on Planning Portal. What was surprising is the female PC said she thought that would break data protection to which I replied no idea but they have to have real name address when they verify otherwise the obvious 100 objection or 100 in favour listings from Mickey Mouse etc....she still said it broke data protection !

I raised this with two of my councillors earlier this week (and told them exactly why it was a concern). Haven't heard back from them yet, but I'll chase if there's nothing in a few days. Yes, they do have to check that people are real, but that doesn't have to entail putting our details out there for the likes of Newell and his thugs to find.

Peggy wrote:

harvetheslayer wrote:

Peggy wrote:

harvetheslayer wrote:

Yea Man wrote:

I only saw 1 address posted which had been copied from the PCC page and then copied in here with a bit of a joke about living in a nicer house or something.

That post was not from Paul Thomas and was condemned by 2 posters and removed by me.

I've heard about these threats and it's all a bit sad and pathetic really from grown men, the address was clearly visible to anyone who views the PCC portal! Doesn't condone the posting of it here as it's a bit of a silly thing to do but jeez come on!

But it perfectly fine to have the personals details of many other people stored on a Flickr account I guess.

I now know who it was (along with Newells involvement) who approached the BM here during the match. Blocked the fella some 18 months ago for continued threats. Filed appropriate Police report half hour ago. K E M S if you think I'm joking. The culprit knows meaning. Pretty stupid to leave your photo on display !

Sorry Harve - are you saying you've / your mate's been threatened for objecting to the planning application, or for allegedly (it wasn't you) posting Newell's address on here, or both?

(And if it's because of the address thing, the irony is that certain individuals will have been filing those details away in their dossiers)

Correct simple as. I haven't divulged the Board Member (BM) here but if he wants to PM you fine by me

I was threatened not the BM who told me. Supposedly I revealed 2 addresses online (somewhere) completely untrue. Newell was mentioned and the other individual I now know who it was. So do the Boys in Blue now.... log 291/1009.....feel free

Edited Peggy yes my address is listed on Planning Portal. What was surprising is the female PC said she thought that would break data protection to which I replied no idea but they have to have real name address when they verify otherwise the obvious 100 objection or 100 in favour listings from Mickey Mouse etc....she still said it broke data protection !

I raised this with two of my councillors earlier this week (and told them exactly why it was a concern). Haven't heard back from them yet, but I'll chase if there's nothing in a few days. Yes, they do have to check that people are real, but that doesn't have to entail putting our details out there for the likes of Newell and his thugs to find.

Feel free to pm and get my details off me and use as an example of what can happen re your councillor. Newell see an address for first time since I moved and Bingo, though buggered if I was going to put a false one

This is all getting predictably sad isn't it!

How did it become so bad that people who genuinely object to Mr Brent's awful plan for CP/HHP fear for their well being because they have used their real names and addresses!

How long has this sort of nefarious shite been going on now? FFS.

P.O.I wrote:

This is all getting predictably sad isn't it!

How did it become so bad that people who genuinely object to Mr Brent's awful plan for CP/HHP fear for their well being because they have used their real names and addresses!

How long has this sort of nefarious shite been going on now? FFS.

Just been pointed out to me that Newell has access to season ticket holders name/address. He finds the BM here having known his real name and sends his goon to pass on the message. BM here had never seen him before in his life. Simple...

Newell already holds our personal details on his personal "mod work file" has done for years.

Back on thread from Grumpy Loyal on the farm.....

"The gym is wholely a private venture from Brent.

If his priority was providing an exclusive gym facility for PAFC, it could have been incorporated into Grandstand refurb. Don't forget Brent's overwhelming preference is to NOT prioritise the Stage 2 build as he stated at the last Forum. So if a private PAFC gym was ever to be on the cards then there would be ample space for it, and of course a small chunk of the huge amount of unbudgeted income of last year could have been earmarked for it.

But of course, a private PAFC facility makes Brent no personal revenue long after he's upped sticks from Argyle, does it?

At no point has Brent stated anything regarding Argyle using this new facility. Of course, in theory, they could. Although it is odd that Brent has failed to mention something that could have been seen as a significant PR pluspoint.

Honestly, is the penny still not dropping as to truly why Brent is here in the first place? :facepalm:

What's to stop Brent clearing off into the sunset and then upping the rent every year?

harvetheslayer wrote:

P.O.I wrote:

This is all getting predictably sad isn't it!

How did it become so bad that people who genuinely object to Mr Brent's awful plan for CP/HHP fear for their well being because they have used their real names and addresses!

How long has this sort of nefarious shite been going on now? FFS.

Just been pointed out to me that Newell has access to season ticket holders name/address. He finds the BM here having known his real name and sends his goon to pass on the message. BM here had never seen him before in his life. Simple...

It's good to volunteer sometimes

Yea Man wrote:

What's to stop Brent clearing off into the sunset and then upping the rent every year?

His conscience, as he bleeds green.