Home Park News (grandstand & Training piches)

So much for Hallets doing it for the community bollocks, when him and Jimmy, ignore the Democratic Trust completely yet include a non elected non Democratic forum owner/dictator.

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

So much for Hallets doing it for the community bollocks, when him and Jimmy, ignore the Democratic Trust completely yet include a non elected non Democratic forum owner/dictator.

Only a matter of time before the hooligan is given Director status at which point the freaks and weirdos will receive lifetime banning orders for divisive activities against PAFC.....Its coming rest assured

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

Here you go:

Tony Hopwood (chair)
John McNulty
Kevin Axworthy
Nick Tomlinson
Sue Clark
Jane Moore
Alan Barry
Ian Newell

Why does brent ruin anything before it starts by tainting it with pig being involved.

the stand is bound to cheap, cheerful, tacky and shit now

Angry wrote:

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

Here you go:

Tony Hopwood (chair)
John McNulty
Kevin Axworthy
Nick Tomlinson
Sue Clark
Jane Moore
Alan Barry
Ian Newell

Why does brent ruin anything before it starts by tainting it with pig being involved.

the stand is bound to cheap, cheerful, tacky and shit now

If Brent and Community Si, were really going to do anything at all it would be designed by now and planning permission applied for, its just a phoney load of nonsense for the Badged up numpties, nothing will be done to the grandstand while these Real Fans own the club.

harvetheslayer wrote:

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

So much for Hallets doing it for the community bollocks, when him and Jimmy, ignore the Democratic Trust completely yet include a non elected non Democratic forum owner/dictator.

Only a matter of time before the hooligan is given Director status at which point the freaks and weirdos will receive lifetime banning orders for divisive activities against PAFC.....Its coming rest assured

No question that this is Newell's ultimate goal. When that day comes, my association with the club ends.

Axworthy? Has he been involved with argyle before?

Mr. Brownstone wrote:

harvetheslayer wrote:

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

So much for Hallets doing it for the community bollocks, when him and Jimmy, ignore the Democratic Trust completely yet include a non elected non Democratic forum owner/dictator.

Only a matter of time before the hooligan is given Director status at which point the freaks and weirdos will receive lifetime banning orders for divisive activities against PAFC.....Its coming rest assured

No question that this is Newell's ultimate goal. When that day comes, my association with the club ends.

I think many others will join you.

Elias wrote:

Axworthy? Has he been involved with argyle before?

He's a trustee on PAST&DT. the 'old' trust.

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

Angry wrote:

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

Here you go:

Tony Hopwood (chair)
John McNulty
Kevin Axworthy
Nick Tomlinson
Sue Clark
Jane Moore
Alan Barry
Ian Newell

Why does brent ruin anything before it starts by tainting it with pig being involved.

the stand is bound to cheap, cheerful, tacky and shit now

If Brent and Community Si, were really going to do anything at all it would be designed by now and planning permission applied for, its just a phoney load of nonsense for the Badged up numpties, nothing will be done to the grandstand while these Real Fans own the club.

Absolutely. I have a feeling its already been designed and this is just for show as no fan ever no matter their allegiances would willing suggest or accept buliding a smaller stand and capping the capacity of it to allow for a bigger conference centre.

with the exception of nool and the gang.

I guess Brent wouldn't want a bitter forum owner whipping up dissent amongst the faithful Janners......

PatDunne wrote:

I guess Brent wouldn't want a bitter forum owner whipping up dissent amongst the faithful Janners......

he couldnt whip up a creme caramel pat these days.

Mr. Brownstone wrote:

harvetheslayer wrote:

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

So much for Hallets doing it for the community bollocks, when him and Jimmy, ignore the Democratic Trust completely yet include a non elected non Democratic forum owner/dictator.

Only a matter of time before the hooligan is given Director status at which point the freaks and weirdos will receive lifetime banning orders for divisive activities against PAFC.....Its coming rest assured

No question that this is Newell's ultimate goal. When that day comes, my association with the club ends.

Not even the Brent Twins, would want the Internet Patrol Officer, in the Board Room would they ?

Angry wrote:

sufferedsince 68 wrote:

Angry wrote:

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

Here you go:

Tony Hopwood (chair)
John McNulty
Kevin Axworthy
Nick Tomlinson
Sue Clark
Jane Moore
Alan Barry
Ian Newell

Why does brent ruin anything before it starts by tainting it with pig being involved.

the stand is bound to cheap, cheerful, tacky and shit now

If Brent and Community Si, were really going to do anything at all it would be designed by now and planning permission applied for, its just a phoney load of nonsense for the Badged up numpties, nothing will be done to the grandstand while these Real Fans own the club.

Absolutely. I have a feeling its already been designed and this is just for show as no fan ever no matter their allegiances would willing suggest or accept buliding a smaller stand and capping the capacity of it to allow for a bigger conference centre.

with the exception of nool and the gang.

Course its already been designed and costed Angry......3 meetings over 3 months as someone said its already rubber stamped awaiting planning application. At best the Working Group will be able to choose the colour of the Shithouse fittings....

Exactly this. Following on from the GASboard debacle, we now have GASboard mark 2 which excludes

The members of the AFT working group, who managed to put forward a much praised plan,
the AFT,
anyone who could not spare Thursday afternoons off from a responsible career in the planning/construction areas
Anyone under the age of 50 (I think)

And if joe public fans were actually supposed to have any input at all, how come the club didn't publish the WG names and contact details, rather than keep them a secret.

A complete waste of time.

Of course there's  nothing to stop the AFT, if it has any oomph left at all post Bob, responding with their own ideas/proposals as they did with the first ludicrous plans.
This so-called working group is designed  to neutralise any real constructive criticism from the fans. should the plans be nothing but a watered down cheaper version of the first stealing of the stadium corners.

Let's see these "initial architects designs" that were presented at the GAGWG then....

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Freathy wrote:

Let's see these "initial architects designs" that were presented at the GAGWG then....

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

No chance of that Freathy.....They'd be caught bang to rights already holding detailed construction plans

I'm not sure there's a great deal of actual construction planned at all is there? The Grandstand structure is staying. It's just a case of bolting on some sort of cheap pre-fab conferencing area to the back, then refurbing and possibly extending dressing rooms etc. Then wack some permanent seats on the Mayflower.

It'll look cheap. It'll look shite. Of course it will. But at least it won't be such a catastrophic disaster as the original boxed-in mini-stand Brent was desperate to lash up.

Yes I have a feeling the only actual 'construction' work planned is the conference facilities. But the very least I that should be required for the grandstand is either the upper tier extended to the full length of the pitch or the horseshoe corners completed up to the grandstand and a new extended roof that also covers the entire lower mayflower area. But nothing on this scale will be planned. New seats upper and lower is all we'll get.

I refer the honourable gentlemen to last Friday's offerings.

green_genie wrote:

Tgwu wrote:

There were loose tongues at the life centre this morning, An Argyle employee talking about the grandstand and mentioned the wings, I foolishly asked him if they were filling in the wings, he said cannot tell you. I should have kept quiet and listen so more.

Adding this to Nool posting pictures of the pillar boxes and extended roof like Goodison Gladys Rd, can see how this is shaping up.

What use they find for the extra "office" space this time should be fun. Chiropodist clinic by Colin's retirement maybe?

None of this makes any sense. They have already stated how much the development will cost, therefore must have quantified the project via a detailed design.

so why the need for a working group ?

Dane. wrote:

None of this makes any sense. They have already stated how much the development will cost, therefore must have quantified the project via a detailed design.

so why the need for a working group ?

Probably going for a reduced Consultation Period for Planning Application.

green_genie wrote:

Dane. wrote:

None of this makes any sense. They have already stated how much the development will cost, therefore must have quantified the project via a detailed design.

so why the need for a working group ?

Probably going for a reduced Consultation Period for Planning Application.

So we will see a return to the group of dickheads camping out side thee council office to cheer for the cameras again whn the planning prmission is granted.

oh great.

green_genie wrote:

Dane. wrote:

None of this makes any sense. They have already stated how much the development will cost, therefore must have quantified the project via a detailed design.

so why the need for a working group ?

Probably going for a reduced Consultation Period for Planning Application.

More so as a box ticking exercise, for me

Fan involvement - tick.

Dane. wrote:

None of this makes any sense. They have already stated how much the development will cost, therefore must have quantified the project via a detailed design.

so why the need for a working group ?

Did they? I thought that they stated a budget, which may have been plucked from thin air, or worked out as a budget cost to a much lower level of detail. Those kind of 'are we in the right ballpark' figures happen way before detailed design. It will be up to the designer to work to the budget (or advise the client if it is unrealistic).