Notts County vs Argyle

Freathy wrote:

Win only masks yet another terrible 'performance' by an appallingly bad team made up of woefully inadequate players.  League survival is the goal.

BRENT OUT

I think Freathy may just be right again. He predicted 2-0 defeats for Argyle in the first 2 matches; he may not have got the scores right, but after those games Argyle's goal difference was 0-4. Spooky. Do you think survival is possible, Freathy?

Coming together nicely, imagine shezza is spitting feathers.
Just wondering what the reaction there is down on the farm, to Derek now after the first win.
Can't be arsed to look.

Right back too slow, centre halves cant win headers, no organisation defending set plays, mc cormick will be very busy this season. County should have been 3 up at half time. Smith cant run properly, songo plays into trouble all the time.
Ball played wide too slow and too late.
Disjointed an understatement.

Great win but we wont be higher than 16th this season, maybe another 'rochdale' celebration (sic) at grimsby in may. Gulp

[quote="Elias"]Right back too slow, centre halves cant win headers, no organisation defending set plays, mc cormick will be very busy this season. County should have been 3 up at half time. Smith cant run properly, songo plays into trouble all the time.
Ball played wide too slow and too late.
Disjointed an understatement.

Apart from that, it all looks good, there still gelling, takes time

PlymptonPilgrim wrote:

FT 2-1 win.

I'm almost moist.

wouldnt go that far maybe slightly damp .....

RegGreen wrote:

PlymptonPilgrim wrote:

FT 2-1 win.

I'm almost moist.

wouldnt go that far maybe slightly damp .....

Plympton Pilgrim is inclined to get moist at many things. When I missed a five footer to square the match against him on the eighteenth green this year, never seen moisture like it- rivulets flowing across the green there was.

Greenskin wrote:

RegGreen wrote:

PlymptonPilgrim wrote:

FT 2-1 win.

I'm almost moist.

wouldnt go that far maybe slightly damp .....

Plympton Pilgrim is inclined to get moist at many things. When I missed a five footer to square the match against him on the eighteenth green this year, never seen moisture like it- rivulets flowing across the green there was.

True. A change of underwear was required

It was more like a 3 footer actually.

PlymptonPilgrim wrote:

A change of underwear was required

It was more like a 3 footer actually.

It must have been big underwear, or do you tuck it in your sock?

Les Miserable wrote:

PlymptonPilgrim wrote:

A change of underwear was required

It was more like a 3 footer actually.

It must have been big underwear, or do you tuck it in your sock?

Tucked in the sock works for me. I must get it re-attached sometime.