'Private Eye' Vs 'The Red Tops'

Rickler wrote:

What about personal mobile devices?

I dunno... It just seems to be a policy that would be unenforcable and what would you achieve anyway - denying them access for at the most, four hours?

I agree with all of this. Banning a site on a network can only go so far but that doesn't mean that they didn't do it. Or that doing it was logical, sensible or effective.

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

Czarcasm wrote:

Spend 10 minutes perusing Pasoti these days and it is quite startling how the site has flipped 180 degrees, from being an independent fansite where fans could debate, question and if need be, give both barrels at how PAFC was being ran.

Now, almost literally, it is an extension of the official site.

Censored and Sanitised. That could pretty much be their motto.

Pasoti is certainly far too closely aligned to the club now and has now effectively replaced Argyle Insider as the informal on-line communication medium.

That's exactly what it is now, all the main page consist of is fan fest, GT promotion and auctions with club representation from Brent's president.

Czarcasm wrote:

Spend 10 minutes perusing Pasoti these days and it is quite startling how the site has flipped 180 degrees, from being an independent fansite where fans could debate, question and if need be, give both barrels at how PAFC was being ran.

Now, almost literally, it is an extension of the official site.

Censored and Sanitised. That could pretty much be their motto.

pretty much football these days

bigger font size in private eye now.

Old news! More pages too!

Censored and Sanitised.

How painfully consistent Pasoti has been eh?