TFOCP needs your help

If people agree with the development, that's their right. They aren't dim, they're just different people.

I don't think in all fairness anybody who made a reasoned response to the plans and supported them would be called an Aviva, the term as you well know is for the people that only make a response when they see how the main herd want them to vote. I could have written Newells response before he did.
To support any scheme because you just want something built rather than nothing smacks of dimness and seems to be the most cogent argument spouted on the farm in favour of the development.

Without Avivas who turn up whatever the situation, we'd be fooked. Ridiculing them is a little easy. What nexr for the edgy intelligent people on here; LOL, fat people eat kfc? Strewth.

Iggy wrote:

I don't think in all fairness anybody who made a reasoned response to the plans and supported them would be called an Aviva, the term as you well know is for the people that only make a response when they see how the main herd want them to vote. I could have written Newells response before he did.
To support any scheme because you just want something built rather than nothing smacks of dimness and seems to be the most cogent argument spouted on the farm in favour of the development.

Spot on Iggy. I first referred to them as Avivas for those reasons exactly.

Geddon you janner !  

I think the chief WUM has been wum'ed, all in all a good days work.