Tudor Evans Online Q&A

Users will be able to visit [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] between 11am and 1pm on Thursday, June 20, and submit their questions live for Cllr Evans to answer.

You can also send your questions in advance to [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] marked Question for Cllr Evans or write to The Herald, 17 Brest Road, Plymouth, PL6 5AA.

## Herald Link ##

Another stitch up no doubt.

Questions WILL be vetted and those asking 'difficult' questions won't get through. ........... just guessing like

Yes Tring I think that you may be right. The completely biased way that the Evening Herald has behaved does not bode well. However - finding out any kind of under-handed practice by them could make for a juicy report to the Press Complaints Commission -

There is no way on earth that the questions that really matter will ever reach TE.
They delete the comments in the Herald, and if you write something that tells it how it is they simply ban you.
The Herald is just like Pasoti, and PAFC,.....Rotten and corrupt to the core.

if i felt he would be asked tough questions that require good answers i would contribute butt i feel tring and the others have it right.

There would be no way the questions that need answering will reach him.

I agree with you all about this probably being a heavily censored stitch-up but surely we should all bombard this Q&A with as many "difficult" questions as possible to see if any slip through their safety net, if none or very few do then our suspicions will be confirmed and we can complain to the relevant regulating bodies. They have been getting away with this press corruption for too long, we desperately need to get our concerns about HHP aired in/on the mainstream media. ATD seems to be the only place freethinking Argyle fans can be heard.

We definitely need to submit questions for this q&a, if they don't ask our questions then like MMB suggests we go to the press complaints commission.
The sooner that this orchestrated pr campaign by Brent is exposed for what it is the better.

IsThatHHP? wrote:

I agree with you all about this probably being a heavily censored stitch-up but surely we should all bombard this Q&A with as many "difficult" questions as possible to see if any slip through their safety net, if none or very few do then our suspicions will be confirmed and we can complain to the relevant regulating bodies. They have been getting away with this press corruption for too long, we desperately need to get our concerns about HHP aired in/on the mainstream media. ATD seems to be the only place freethinking Argyle fans can be heard.

Newest candidate for 'thought of the day'.

email gone in

Can Cllr Evans consider the comment below from this article [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

A planned and co-ordinated approach to encourage long term growth has been thrown up in the air, he said, as a result of a Government inspector declaring the Derriford and Seaton Area Action Plan likely to be found unsound.

The inspector's initial findings have been published and could signal a new era of uncertainty - particularly for the city centre, warned Councillor Evans and he said: “We are still trying to figure out the implications of this judgement, but we are worried, very worried. This could lead to piecemeal developments that could jeopardise the economic future of the city centre."

and explain how he can reconcile that statement with plans for over 5000 sq m of retail and food outlets at HHP, which James Brent has described as "This will be a full sports and retail complex, a destination its own right ".

That's a beauty.

I see Newell and his chums have hi-jacked the comments section

As has been said, here's the chance to see if the process is rigged. If everyone with a view posts their question and none get answered then you can safely assume that it's a hand picked Q and A.

I think everyone knows that Postey and Newell will be having questions answered that make it sound like the best thing since sliced bread, seeing as they're right behind the plans, so to try and counter that there have to be some searching questions which might open peoples eyes and will allow them to make up their mind about the whole thing with the actual facts out in the open instead of just the bits Akkeron want you to see.

The Herald have already shown where their allegiances lie and unless this point of view is questioned that's all the residents of Plymouth will be seeing before making up their minds.

Once it gets planning permission and work begins there's no use complaining about it then.

Sent this : along the same lines, asking for a straight answer, either yes or no.

my guess is that he will not answer straight, thats assuming he will even receive the question. heres hoping.

'Id like to ask the councellor for his view on the following :


with plans for over 5000 sq ft of retail space going into the higher home park development, i trust the councellor will be voting against this development, especially with regards to his view on the redevelopment of the city centre.


Could he please either confirm or deny whether he is for or against the development of hhp, as it stands at present'

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

The PCC Meeting is online now. I can't get video to load but there is a twitter feed by Herald journo

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

PCC by-election for Southway coming up at end of month

Anybody eligible to vote in that ward could be asking candidates for their thoughts

green_genie wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

PCC by-election for Southway coming up at end of month

Anybody eligible to vote in that ward could be asking candidates for their thoughts

Good god. These people run this city? What a bunch of misfits. Half of them are dead in their chairs, councillors who have spoken so-far speak like 5 year old infants, they spout their guff like they have never been further than Dawlish Warren. There's a young girl talking now (15:29) who ends her sentences with an upward intonation - she sounds like Vicky Pollard from Little Britain, and she had a head like a witch-doctors rattle.

Burn em all.

If Iggybops' comment remains then maybe the Herald has altered its screening process, we shall see.

Iggy wrote:

If Iggybops' comment remains then maybe the Herald has altered its screening process, we shall see.

It's still there.

Who's in the gang of 10?

Ill give it 2 hours till the Herald delete half those comments against Brent.
The Herald need to be reported to the press complaints committee, absolute blatant corruption and filth, i will never buy that stinking bent as a nine bob note rag ever again...not that i was ever keen on it anyway

since when has that nutter paul thomas been pro pasoti?

Looks like the Iggybop comment has gone ( what a surprise ) . The Brent/Akkeron PR machine is in full swing over on the 'erald webshite, who is the retarded Baltimore ?

General R aka Baltimore I presume is Paul Thomas who has been banned from both sites for being a trolling nutter, Newell calls him a fruit loop.

Iggy wrote:

General R aka Baltimore I presume is Paul Thomas who has been banned from both sites for being a trolling nutter, Newell calls him a fruit loop.

yet speaks happliy with him and webb on social mediasites :s