Club Statement

Webb gone.........

Sorry, cruel joke.

Just another dig at the trust:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Just another pile of shyte from Webb's blog.

Yea Man wrote:

Webb gone.........

Sorry, cruel joke.

Just another dig at the trust:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

So is it this

1. What is the Club’s current financial position?
Club written response: In the current financial year revenue has been lower than budgeted with costs broadly in line with budget. The year to date shortfall in net revenue has been funded by the investors and associated companies.

Or is it............ a loan, putting the club further into debt ? Brent and his inner cifcle kept the exceptional one, who wasted the budget and the club has to pay or have the investors and associated companies paid for their mistakes ?

Did I read somewhere that Brent is pumping money into the club to keep it going by way of loans?

So we're just getting into MORE debt?

Blah blah blah, lip quivering, blah bullshite, cloud cuckoo land, imbecile blah blah, fingers in ear 'I can't hear you' rubbish.
Sorry for any offence

By Petrie's tone on the farm, I don't think the trust will back down.

At last we may have a fans' group worthy of supporting and one that will grow and grow.

Just got to keep the devious ones out of it now.

I've heard that he is putting 40k a week in to keep them afloat

It seem that the club is intent on creating war with it's fans, it's all quite amazing really.

Dane. wrote:

I've heard that he is putting 40k a week in to keep them afloat

And were did that come from then? we could all pluck a figure out of the air

Dane. wrote:

I've heard that he is putting 40k a week in to keep them afloat

I have heard its 100k but the club will settle for 75k

It's just what I was told. Nothing official or anything

Frank Bullitt wrote:

Dane. wrote:

I've heard that he is putting 40k a week in to keep them afloat

I have heard its 100k but the club will settle for 75k

It is interesting that the club are quick to come out this 'response' to the Trust statement.

Yet we still hear absolutely nothing about the predicament the the club are currently in - adrift at the bottom of League 2.

Perhaps they haven't noticed.

I think the Trust have realised that the club is a shambles from top to bottom. I am sure the club will deny this, but the league table doesn't lie.

Frank Bullitt wrote:

Dane. wrote:

I've heard that he is putting 40k a week in to keep them afloat

I have heard its 100k but the club will settle for 75k

The club is a joke. So small time it's un-true. Always have, always will. The way they try to portray themselves as anything other than this just makes it seem worse.

PlymptonPilgrim wrote:

It is interesting that the club are quick to come out this 'response' to the Trust statement.

Yet we still hear absolutely nothing about the predicament the the club are currently in - adrift at the bottom of League 2.

Perhaps they haven't noticed.

That's not as important as controlling the fanbase

Tringreen wrote:

PlymptonPilgrim wrote:

It is interesting that the club are quick to come out this 'response' to the Trust statement.

Yet we still hear absolutely nothing about the predicament the the club are currently in - adrift at the bottom of League 2.

Perhaps they haven't noticed.

That's not as important as controlling the fanbase

No, it's not as important as property development. Because that really is all that matters to the current owner, quivering lip or not.

Controlling the fanbase is something that will never be achieved despite the best/worst efforts of Webb and Newell.

PlymptonPilgrim wrote:

Tringreen wrote:

PlymptonPilgrim wrote:

It is interesting that the club are quick to come out this 'response' to the Trust statement.

Yet we still hear absolutely nothing about the predicament the the club are currently in - adrift at the bottom of League 2.

Perhaps they haven't noticed.

That's not as important as controlling the fanbase

No, it's not as important as property development. Because that really is all that matters to the current owner, quivering lip or not.

Controlling the fanbase is something that will never be achieved despite the best/worst efforts of Webb and Newell.

I assumed the property development as Brent's priority was taken as read.

Looks like the wheels are about to come off.

How very sad for a club that should be so much better.

ps shut up cholwell, nobody cares what you say.How about answering jock's questions........... did you or didn't you ? Is Lee telling porkies ? What a frikkin shower !

erm i just mentions the PASB, arent they different from the trust ?

webby and co will be made to earn their positions in the coming weeks

Ah bless 'em! There they are in their box wondering how people who stump up a lot of money to watch drivel, have the temerity to question them. I await the day the reopen the terrace just so they can literally whiz on us from a great height.

Frank Bullitt wrote:

I have heard its 100k but the club will settle for 75k

Wouldn't the standard PAFC write down take that figure to £1-75.

I'm struggling to understand why anyone, including the Trust, thinks it's worth trying to engage with Brent.

That statement is just "go away and stop annoying me you tiresome little oiks" dressed up a bit