Question

What will sacking fletcher actually achieve.Argyle clearly don't have the money to go out and buy better players. What will a new man be able to do different


You can't polish shit

I'm guessing you don't know a lot about man management or have any tactical nous.

Argyle clearly could have the money to go out and buy better players, but whether handing it over to Carl Fletcher is such a good idea is an entirely different proposition.

My point is. With this current group of players you could stick fergie in charge or Jose and I doubt they could do much better. There has to come a point when the players have to shoulder some responsibility.

I do not believe this squad of players are as shit as the league position suggests, i think with this squad we are a mid-table side, under Fletcher we are not even close to achieving that.
The bloke is only 31 years old, he is way too naive (some might say thick judging by his interviews)
We are amongst the highest attendances in League 2 and yet we scurry around in the dirt competing with the likes of Dagenham and Barnet .
Fletcher needs toi get a grip of this squad, (was it not him in the first place that complained that Peter Reid had lost the dressing room?!) he seems weak, no moral courage to be bold and start gripping the squad, tell them where they are going wrong..start giving them extra training ..feck the players hes supposed to be the boss ffs.
And as for the great Satans Newell, webb and forza nerd...dont get me started

Saltash green wrote:

My point is. With this current group of players you could stick fergie in charge or Jose and I doubt they could do much better. There has to come a point when the players have to shoulder some responsibility.

Have to agree not sure there are any managers without a club who could improve us at the moment.

Im hoping fletcher brings in some good players on loan.

PlymptonPilgrim wrote:

I'm guessing you don't know a lot about man management or have any tactical nous.

Are you Carl Fletcher?

Grovehill wrote:

PlymptonPilgrim wrote:

I'm guessing you don't know a lot about man management or have any tactical nous.

Are you Carl Fletcher?

You only have to watch and listen to the man. He just hasn't got what it takes.

Saltash green wrote:

What will sacking fletcher actually achieve.Argyle clearly don't have the money to go out and buy better players. What will a new man be able to do different


You can't polish shit

there are plenty of managers out there looking for jobs who have a far better pedigree in man management and tactical ability not forgetting can actually coach footballers that wont cost the earth nor need to totally rebuild the squad as the squad minus one or two additions is good its just badly lead.

Renegade wrote:

Saltash green wrote:

What will sacking fletcher actually achieve.Argyle clearly don't have the money to go out and buy better players. What will a new man be able to do different


You can't polish shit

there are plenty of managers out there looking for jobs who have a far better pedigree in man management and tactical ability not forgetting can actually coach footballers that wont cost the earth nor need to totally rebuild the squad as the squad minus one or two additions is good its just badly lead.

Out of intrest who would you suggest.

Paul ince is one i would look at but i think he will be after a big contract

Saltash green wrote:

What will sacking fletcher actually achieve.Argyle clearly don't have the money to go out and buy better players. What will a new man be able to do different


You can't polish shit

If you were the manager what would you change?

Genuine question seeing as you're a manager

Fancy the job?

oxfordgreen wrote:

Renegade wrote:

Saltash green wrote:

What will sacking fletcher actually achieve.Argyle clearly don't have the money to go out and buy better players. What will a new man be able to do different


You can't polish shit

there are plenty of managers out there looking for jobs who have a far better pedigree in man management and tactical ability not forgetting can actually coach footballers that wont cost the earth nor need to totally rebuild the squad as the squad minus one or two additions is good its just badly lead.

Out of intrest who would you suggest.

Paul ince is one i would look at but i think he will be after a big contract

His Reputation has taken a battering in recent years after leaving Blackburn so i dont think he will demand money on the same sort of scale as before.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] here is a list of available managers (probably not all of them granted) out of the list here i would say Richard Money would be a good choice.

Any one of them couldnt do any worse then el thicko

punchdrunk wrote:

Any one of them couldnt do any worse then el thicko

We all know your view on the manager. Who would you want incharge?

Forget the manager, an owner that cares instead of the masquerader Brent would help.

GOB wrote:

Forget the manager, an owner that cares instead of the masquerader Brent would help.

I'd love a crack at being the CEO of Tesco and if the Chairman and the board are stupid enough to appoint me thats hardly my fault I don't have the experience, I would do the job with the best of intentions and give it 101% but it would be a long shot for me to succeed. Thats why I don;t blame Fletcher as such, the fact he is inept should be a major concern for Brent. I'm sure Fletcher is trying his best but it isn't good enough. The people who keep him there are the ones to blame.

Saltash green wrote:

What will sacking fletcher actually achieve.Argyle clearly don't have the money to go out and buy better players. What will a new man be able to do different


You can't polish shit

So right.

Look at what this site has to put up with!

mouldyoldgoat wrote:

Saltash green wrote:

What will sacking fletcher actually achieve.Argyle clearly don't have the money to go out and buy better players. What will a new man be able to do different


You can't polish shit

So right.

Look at what this site has to put up with!

What an awful attitude. No one makes you stay do they ?

Saltash green wrote:

mouldyoldgoat wrote:

Saltash green wrote:

What will sacking fletcher actually achieve.Argyle clearly don't have the money to go out and buy better players. What will a new man be able to do different


You can't polish shit

So right.

Look at what this site has to put up with!

What an awful attitude. No one makes you stay do they ?

If we re-banned you nobody would miss you

Infact, maybe we should set a vote up as to whether we should kick you back off?

Democracy at it's best.

For what reason ? Going against the general opinion ??? How very pasoti of you

Because your team have won more matches this season than Argyle

New managers generally (I said generally) oversee an improvement in results. It's whether that improvement can be maintained that matters.

And anyway, I think it's a redundant debate because regardless of how many of us think Fletch should go - and I'm on the fence on that one right now - the casting vote lays with James Brent and I don't see him wielding the axe just yet.

Saltash green wrote:

mouldyoldgoat wrote:

Saltash green wrote:

What will sacking fletcher actually achieve.Argyle clearly don't have the money to go out and buy better players. What will a new man be able to do different


You can't polish shit

So right.

Look at what this site has to put up with!

What an awful attitude. No one makes you stay do they ?

No nobody does. There again nobody pulls my strings and tells me what to do like some I could mention.

Yea Man wrote:

Because your team have won more matches this season than Argyle

Hahhaha. Fair enough although like argyle I don't see where the next one is coming from at the moment lol.

Personally i would not let Fletcher order the pasties let alone manage the team and the same goes for the rest of the management team.It seems that we have become a rest home for old players.We need a proper manager who can pick his own staff.In case Mr Brent is reading this , none of the current playing staff have what it takes to become a manager , even if they are really cheap.