Tyler Harvey to Forest?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

(I'll put the humble pie in the oven for Uber-Cock-Knobend Xisle)

Czarcasm wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

(I'll put the humble pie in the oven for Uber-Cock-Knobend Xisle)

Uber-Cock:cheers:

I wouldn't read too much into it personally. In the past quite a few Argyle players have trained at Premier clubs but weren't taken on by them, notably Wotton at Sheffield Wednesday, Bastow at Derby and Summerfield at Chelsea. Can't see what Tyler [ ] has really done to justify a permanent move at this stage of his career but stranger things have happened I suppose.

Greenskin wrote:

I wouldn't read too much into it personally. In the past quite a few Argyle players have trained at Premier clubs but weren't taken on by them, notably Wotton at Sheffield Wednesday, Bastow at Derby and Summerfield at Chelsea. Can't see what Tyler [ ] has really done to justify a permanent move at this stage of his career but stranger things have happened I suppose.

Foreshore yeah. I just found it rather amusing to have the story confirmed after xisle had dismissed it in his usual style.

Greenskin wrote:

I wouldn't read too much into it personally. In the past quite a few Argyle players have trained at Premier clubs but weren't taken on by them, notably Wotton at Sheffield Wednesday, Bastow at Derby and Summerfield at Chelsea. Can't see what Tyler [ ] has really done to justify a permanent move at this stage of his career but stranger things have happened I suppose.

Tyler is young with a bit of footballing talent, the exact opposite of Xthrobber the Knobber and fvckwits like him.

He was rumoured some weeks ago to be after a loan move away in January.

What's he ever done ?!!

I find this strange as Harvey struggles to perform consistently too attract big clubs

It just seems like someone at Forest believed the lad had potential. He hasn't set the world alight here but he was given a relatively decent contract, so there must have been signs early doors that he was a potential star. Let's be honest if there's a sniff of a fee to be had, Brent will be packing Tyler's boots and kit away pretty sharpish.

Czarcasm wrote:

Greenskin wrote:

I wouldn't read too much into it personally. In the past quite a few Argyle players have trained at Premier clubs but weren't taken on by them, notably Wotton at Sheffield Wednesday, Bastow at Derby and Summerfield at Chelsea. Can't see what Tyler [ ] has really done to justify a permanent move at this stage of his career but stranger things have happened I suppose.

Foreshore yeah. I just found it rather amusing to have the story confirmed after xisle had dismissed it in his usual style.

What's that then, style over substance?

Or uncle lip wobbling speccy's mouthpiece spouting more hot air to go along with the trust, transparency, honesty, openness, financial responsibility blah blah blah.....he so loves to lecture about....only he doesn't now because that train has left the station a long time ago......choo choo

It seems that at least one football club realise that just because someone isn't the complete package at 19 and a half doesn't mean they're worth writing off. More than some at Argyle seem to.

Transfer embargo for Forest.

spowell92 wrote:

Transfer embargo for Forest.

Not quite right, they are banned from buying anyone, Freebies and loans are fine, if this is true you wont get a penny for him

Motorservices wrote:

spowell92 wrote:

Transfer embargo for Forest.

Not quite right, they are banned from buying anyone, Freebies and loans are fine, if this is true you wont get a penny for him

He's under contract so they'll have to wait till that's up to agree a freebie (even then, due to his age they'd have to pay some kind of compensation?). I believe swaps are allowed, so we'd be able to get an immediate replacement if they're that keen to get him and Sheridan thinks they've got a greater addition to our squad. Also, hopefully the one in one out rule that these embargo'd clubs are under helps us turn O'Connor's loan into a permanent switch.

Funnily enough, Forest won Sky Bet's £250,000 transfer fund also. They're only allowed to use it to pay loan fees and player wages though.

Czarcasm wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

(I'll put the humble pie in the oven for Uber-Cock-Knobend Xisle)

Put it on a low heat though, the comment related to Tyler holding his own at the "bigger, faster, stronger, fitter" level of championship football, I fear your pie may have long since gone off if that (ahem) 'pie in the sky' notion ever came true.

spowell92 wrote:

Motorservices wrote:

spowell92 wrote:

Transfer embargo for Forest.

Not quite right, they are banned from buying anyone, Freebies and loans are fine, if this is true you wont get a penny for him

He's under contract so they'll have to wait till that's up to agree a freebie (even then, due to his age they'd have to pay some kind of compensation?). I believe swaps are allowed, so we'd be able to get an immediate replacement if they're that keen to get him and Sheridan thinks they've got a greater addition to our squad. Also, hopefully the one in one out rule that these embargo'd clubs are under helps us turn O'Connor's loan into a permanent switch.

Funnily enough, Forest won Sky Bet's £250,000 transfer fund also. They're only allowed to use it to pay loan fees and player wages though.

knowing argyle he ll be allowed to leave in exchange for a 38year old with a dodgy knee.