More Porkies.....

Some people tell so many porkies they seem to forget what reality is and convince themselves that everthing they say is the truth.   


Referring to his own forum, you know who wrote:

"As for your second point, nothing I know of has ever been 'edited' unless bad language (this IS a child friendly site) or the potentially libellous stuff, which we also don't allow, crops up.

Anyone who has a single brain cell, can see this site allows all comment, and whilst the debate may rage, people can post whatever they want within the criteria set out above". 



Strange how i've been banned twice, not for using bad language or saying anything libellous but for daring to question the  

What the pasoti dictator calls libellous, is anyone doubting the glorious speccy banker and his deep deep lurve of plymouth arsenal.

Jack Sheppard wrote:

Some people tell so many porkies they seem to forget what reality is and convince themselves that everthing they say is the truth.   


Referring to his own forum, you know who wrote:

"As for your second point, nothing I know of has ever been 'edited' unless bad language (this IS a child friendly site) or the potentially libellous stuff, which we also don't allow, crops up.

Anyone who has a single brain cell, can see this site allows all comment, and whilst the debate may rage, people can post whatever they want within the criteria set out above". 



Strange how i've been banned twice, not for using bad language or saying anything libellous but for daring to question the  

So the Deepthroat stuff wasn't edited for a start?

 

Don't confuse editing with "cleaning" completely different.

Ahh, my mistake, moving complete posts or whole chunks of a thread in an attempt to cover his tracks doesn't count as editing, thats "cleaning"................maybe i should apologise to    

You are guilty of libel as well Jack, otherwise known as pointing out the devious underhand tactics of a control freak. It's a minefield I tell thee.

Frank Bullitt once remarked that in his line of work, he comes across devious characters who actually appear to believe the tales they tell and the lies become truths in their own mind.

Everyone now Knows the depths the farm controllers will plumb. Methinks he doth protest too much. 

It's a forum about Argyle ffs - not the UN. Giving it as much gravitas as you do is just plain silly. You're a big wally Tring.

Don't fight with me either as I've dressed my xbox avatar up as a pirate today.... he'll kick your wrinkled perma-tanned backside.

hairy j wrote:

It's a forum about Argyle ffs - not the UN. Giving it as much gravitas as you do is just plain silly. You're a big wally Tring.

Clueless.

Uh ho. Tin hat on, popcorn out. Here we go. 

   

punchdrunk wrote:

   

Troll time again?     

Rickler wrote:

hairy j wrote:

It's a forum about Argyle ffs - not the UN. Giving it as much gravitas as you do is just plain silly. You're a big wally Tring.

Clueless.

5291 is the pasoti member list. Most online at one time, 1873. That's not many people really.

The internet does have other websites.

hairy j wrote:

Rickler wrote:

hairy j wrote:

It's a forum about Argyle ffs - not the UN. Giving it as much gravitas as you do is just plain silly. You're a big wally Tring.

Clueless.

5291 is the pasoti member list. Most online at one time, 1873. That's not many people really.

The internet does have other websites.

As a matter of interest, the impression given of that figure isn't strictly correct, it's the number of users online over a given period of time and not users actually online all at the same time.

Is it safe to say that pasoti has around 2,000 regular posters/lurkers/readers? If that's case, there's more people who go to watch Torquay on a Tuesday night in February. It's Newell's mini-empire.
They'd struggle to fill the new stand with pasoti members.

I think it's considerably less than that even Hairy. We did a while back carry out a bit of a spying mission that revealed the usage of pasoti had dropped off considerably but there is probably a number of reasons for that, the performance of the Club, the Newell Files, losing its independence status from the Club and to a very small extent the existence of ATD etc.

I do agree though, pasoti is given far too much limelight but that's probably because people understand that without pasoti, Newell has very little clout and therefore everything pasoti related is analysed.

So we're talking 23 people? You could fit them on a small bus.

It's pretty annoying to read so much pasoti on here. I've linked to the place myself but mentioning pasoti posters every time you post is incredibly dull reading and it's a bit pointless. It doesn't happen over there very often and for me, it feels like ATD has an inferiority complex. Some people on here are curtain twitchers.

Sorry, forgot, using facts and being reasonably impartial means I'm clueless.

I got banned over there but life goes on. I don't feel as though my human rights have been taken away by a fascist regime. That's all a bit 'angsty teenager' in my view. I don't think it has really affected my quality of life.

Agreed.

GOB wrote:

I think it's considerably less than that even Hairy. We did a while back carry out a bit of a spying mission that revealed the usage of pasoti had dropped off considerably but there is probably a number of reasons for that, the performance of the Club, the Newell Files, losing its independence status from the Club and to a very small extent the existence of ATD etc.

I do agree though, pasoti is given far too much limelight but that's probably because people understand that without pasoti, Newell has very little clout and therefore everything pasoti related is analysed.

Remember when Newell boasted Pasoti gets over a millions hits a day?

Not even close to that figure  

It may get a million "hits" but that includes the people who view a thread then click back to the main page  

How many unique hits do you get Newelly baby?  

Yea Man wrote:

GOB wrote:

I think it's considerably less than that even Hairy. We did a while back carry out a bit of a spying mission that revealed the usage of pasoti had dropped off considerably but there is probably a number of reasons for that, the performance of the Club, the Newell Files, losing its independence status from the Club and to a very small extent the existence of ATD etc.

I do agree though, pasoti is given far too much limelight but that's probably because people understand that without pasoti, Newell has very little clout and therefore everything pasoti related is analysed.

Remember when Newell boasted Pasoti gets over a millions hits a day?

Not even close to that figure  

It may get a million "hits" but that includes the people who view a thread then click back to the main page  

How many unique hits do you get Newelly baby?  

Yup, more hits than a Colombian drugs dealer!  

BUMP !!   

The last couple of times i've bothered to read exeweb(it's crap but nowhere near as crap as the official   Argyle fans forum) i've noticed    keeps mentioning Argyle supporting freaks. Does anyone know who he is referring to ?   

http://www.exeweb.com/forums/showthread.php?53109-Chuckles-and-I

He obviously wants to get this news out there. If it is who I think he's refering to then I'm utterly astonished.

Czarcasm wrote:

He obviously wants to get this news out there. If it is who I think he's refering to then I'm utterly astonished.

who do you have in mind my guess it wasnt horatio homewrecker or jimmy the bent

oh and avatar needs changing ole boy its soooo 2013

Angry wrote:

Czarcasm wrote:

He obviously wants to get this news out there. If it is who I think he's refering to then I'm utterly astonished.

who do you have in mind my guess it wasnt horatio homewrecker or jimmy the bent

oh and avatar needs changing ole boy its soooo 2013

1) Well, he used to be a regular ATDer though his persuasion wasn't green.

2) I'm aware the avatar needs changing - I even said so in Mundane earlier.   

The weirdo from Cyprus gets a mention on one of his other threads and a fair few for ATD(or ADHD as he prefers to call it)