Last day to lodge planning objections with PCC.

Or support them if you have a vested interest in the outcome, come on let's get it done!

Send the filthy stinking evil rotten plans and the Mini-stand all the way down to Davey Jones locker.
Brent Out

Here's another reminder of the link.....

>LINK<

I notice the letter I sent to Mr Evan has been put in to the mix

Mine should be on its way within the hour.

I think the last day is 3rd July.

See here

punchdrunk wrote:

Send the filthy stinking evil rotten plans and the Mini-stand all the way down to Davey Jones locker.
Brent Out

I do have problems deciding at times if posters are for or against the HHP development generally....but I'll have a wild guess on this one......ummmmm against I think.

just got the wife to send one, cost me a new outfit for her holidays which is in a couple of weeks

Done. I did reluctantly object, only on the pricipal that there is no solid evidence that the ground could be expanded, which for me is the priority, i am happy with the rest of the development.

I think that the objection is more constructive then the pros, and the objection are mounting up, I am just suspicious that the Muppets have some thing plan

125+1 wrote:

Done.  I did reluctantly object, only on the pricipal that there is no solid evidence that the ground could be expanded, which for me is the priority, i am happy with the rest of the development.

Dentist ? School ? 197 storey hotel ? come on 125+1, like you my main objection is the pathetic ministand but surely you must see that the rest of the development also has many flaws ?

125+1 wrote:

Done.  I did reluctantly object, only on the pricipal that there is no solid evidence that the ground could be expanded, which for me is the priority, i am happy with the rest of the development.

That will not be seen as a valid reason for an objection.

Can we increase the size of the stadium? Of course it can be, it is just the cost that concerns. But that is for another day. I see comparisons being made with the 2 Bristol clubs. One has just sold out to a large supermarket for millions and got preferential terms on its new site and the other is owned by a life long fan who is worth mega millions. JB falls into neither of those categories.

Tony Hooper nails it on the farm but for the wrong reasons, JB is mega wealthy but as he points out he is not a fan, just get it built is the cry. Bum licking wankers.
JonB also doing his job keeping his title giver happy by being in full support.
My objection in now, we will see.

Some rep Hooper is, does he not understand that there are half a dozen businesses attached to the Brents stand that prevent future expansion?

JonB...does anyone really give a toss what he says? I consider him as a completely irrelevant and insignificant head nodder.

When can Hooper be removed from the PASB?

Once the plans are in all the pasb becomes is a condemned man, condemned to be ignored, it will fizzle out as intended.

I doubt Hooper could be voted off the PASB whenever the next elections are, because he's now in with the gang on Pasoti.

Him and Newell are now bosom buddies despite the fact that Newell outed Hooper as the pi hired to track me down, which snooper half heartedly denies. So I keep challenging Hooper to deny it publicly because Newell and Webb both state categorically that Hooper was the weasel Jameson hired.

Despite the fact that I know for certain that both Newell and Webb are both lying fuckers I think that on this occasion it's Hooper talking shit.

Something happened around the time of the PASB elections to make Hooper and Newell suddenly become friendly and it's probably to do with giving Hooper maximum exposure on Pasoti in return for him shutting his big mouth and falling into line.

The same seems to have happened with Jon b, used ATD to gain votes in the PASB elections and was threatened by the usual suspect on Pasoti with losing votes if he continued to post on here, now Jon B and Hooper wouldn't touch this place with a bargepole and have had the directors box treatment in return for their support of the HHP plans.

Pathetic really but then I did watch the panorama episode about all the lies those bastard coppers told over the Hillsborough disaster so anything said or done by anyone in the police force shouldn't surprise me.

It's just sad to see grown men knelt down giving head for a poxy comfy seat next to a bunch of wankers.

Quote :

Friends of Central Park Plymouth


Last official day to get objections into the planning department against the huge development at Home Park.

Friends of Central Park are a campaigning group opposed to this huge development on Central Park and especially at this moment the hotel and roads on the leasehold land which is not within the freehold footprint. This brings roads to access a 400 space car park and 121 bed hotel deep within the parkland.

Thank you to everyone who has tirelessly delivered leaflets! With the army who rose to do this we could have delivered 1000's more! The momentum has increased and we could just do with a couple more weeks, but tomorrow is the deadline! Evidently late letters can be sent in but we cannot be sure they will be counted. Better to write though late than not write at all!

For details of how to oppose see below, email your objection to: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Thank you everyone again. We are sure there will still be more work to do and it won't finish here

What are the timescales in terms of decision? I want to make sure I've got enough popcorn in.

Pokesdown wrote:

What are the timescales in terms of decision? I want to make sure I've got enough popcorn in.

I think for large scale developments such as the HHP proposals your talking 6-8 weeks, i'd get the popcorn in early though mate, it's usually got a good use by date on it and will probably still be edible long after Jimmy B has made his millions and slithered off to his next development project.

Even if I was detached from the Club this would be an interesting one just because it departs away from the PCC planning policy by about 90%. In a world of non corruption I would have said that Brent is an idiot for even attempting it, unfortunately it's not a world of non corruption.

ZYPH wrote:

125+1 wrote:

Done.  I did reluctantly object, only on the pricipal that there is no solid evidence that the ground could be expanded, which for me is the priority, i am happy with the rest of the development.

That will not be seen as a valid reason for an objection.

Yes it will as you do not have to post your comments.

I fear it may come down to the govt. wanting investment at any cost, this farce is just another reason we need a proper revolution in this country.

Bump!

Fair play to 'em. All 10 pages included in today's multiple