Gurrieri!

I am sorry, but it frustrates me that we are carrying this player along with us. He is not a 'youngster' as such or indeed he is not a 'wee nugget'. The fact is, he couldn't even penetrate the Burton starting line up and now he can't get in to ours. Same with Gorman to be honest, glad he's gone back. I am not saying Gurrieri should play, as he is very poor, but its a total waste.

you say this now but i bet if he comes good ie with feeney, williams and countless others your be his biggest fan.


Gurrieri is a mystery its a mystery as ti why the club signed him.

He shone against Saltash in the game against Saltash last pre-season.

Renegade wrote:

you say this now but i bet if he comes good ie with feeney, williams and countless others your be his biggest fan.


Gurrieri is a mystery its a mystery as ti why the club signed him.

I have never slated Williams and have seen the potential since the first time I ever saw him play for Argyle which was against Bristol City in pre season last year. Feeney is another player I do not slate as his effort rate is top notch.

Gurrieri however, is a poor technical player and doesn't look to give it his all. Not a team player.

I said exactly the same thing when I saw him close-up. He was bullied off the ball by Tiverton players, never once went past his man, and what happens? He gets a bloody contract because as everyone knows we were short of lightweight wingers

I saw him at HP last season in a pre season friendly and he looked the business in that one game. A poor man's Halmosi.

I wouldn't be surprised if he was signed on the recommendation of our Supreme Leader Webb, and his henchman.

Gurrieri, Chadwick, Feeney, Lennox, Gilmartin, Cowan Hall

If we could get rid of all of these, our squad wouldn't be any weaker.

Factor in the injury concerns over Griffiths and Lowry...

I'd swap all 8 for two decent players.

Mock Cuncher wrote:

Gurrieri, Chadwick, Feeney, Lennox, Gilmartin, Cowan Hall

If we could get rid of all of these, our squad wouldn't be any weaker.

Factor in the injury concerns over Griffiths and Lowry...

I'd swap all 8 for two decent players.

I concur. Certainly the first six anyway.

Gilmartin? Not sure if Chenoweth's up to being a number 2 yet. I think it's good that Cole has proper competition so he knows his place isn't for granted.

I think we'd be a little short on strikers if we got rid of all those too. If you were to say swap the other seven (aside RG) for three high end League Two players I'd probably agree.

GreenSam wrote:

Gilmartin? Not sure if Chenoweth's up to being a number 2 yet. I think it's good that Cole has proper competition so he knows his place isn't for granted.

I think we'd be a little short on strikers if we got rid of all those too. If you were to say swap the other seven (aside RG) for three high end League Two players I'd probably agree.

Ollie i presume will now be loaned out for first team football which will benefit all parties. He is young and got ability so if the club can get him playing regularly the better for him

I saw Cowan-Hall for a short while but that, along with commentaries & reading, makes me think he is worth a punt - at least as an impact sub. I disagree with Griffiths for sure and who knows about Lowry (anyway, he's Cornish and we should support such diversity in our club).

Otherwise I would lose the other five.

Dingle wrote:

He shone against Saltash in the game against Saltash last pre-season.

No he bloody didnt, he was pants

Like all Argyle players,if they were any good they wouldnt be here.Witness any player with anything about them are gone at the first opportunity.