same old brand new shirt for 2020/21 season

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

its here more photos and such will be available tomorrow or later tonight.

to me looks absolutely no difference to what we are wearing now bar collars and cuffs.  rip off puma are Piss takers, or do we really need to address the length of service each shirt has? as every year changes clearly are too much for kit manufacturers to cope with design wise.

Why are the top of the socks coloured grey? They look awful.

Rickler wrote:

Why are the top of the socks coloured grey?  They look awful.

not sure but they maybe white in the main photos when they come out.

Garbage. Another one I won’t be buying ( not that I ever did )

I've hated this awful drab dark green ever since it was adopted nearly 20 years ago. These crap Puma kits make it look 10 times worse.

Angry wrote:

Rickler wrote:

Why are the top of the socks coloured grey?  They look awful.

not sure but they maybe white in the main photos when they come out.

To my eyes the hoop or band at the top of the socks is definitely 'grey' in appearance.  I think on closer inspection it might be an area of many small width hoops in black or green, but from a short distance they give a 'grey' appearance?  Who knows?  I don't really care as I don't like them.

With the shirt that dark of a green, we should definitely be playing in white shorts.

So it's not the best of kits in my view.

The black shorts would work if they lightened the green a little bit but that’s flogging a dead horse as the club refuse to budge on the subject.
Always said our colours are green/black/white

Rickler wrote:

Angry wrote:

Rickler wrote:

Why are the top of the socks coloured grey?  They look awful.

not sure but they maybe white in the main photos when they come out.

To my eyes the hoop or band at the top of the socks is definitely 'grey' in appearance.  I think on closer inspection it might be an area of many small width hoops in black or green, but from a short distance they give a 'grey' appearance?  Who knows?  I don't really care as I don't like them.

With the shirt that dark of a green, we should definitely be playing in white shorts.

So it's not the best of kits in my view.

yeap and when we play evening games it will be an issue for the players like it was under del bhey that season he complained about it.

It's all horrible nylon shite anyway the colour doesn't matter that much.

How much are they paying the designers at Puma? - minimum wage for the 8 hours it must took so under a £ton!! I am astounded, its fcuking shit!!

Bandwagon wrote:

How much are they paying the designers at Puma? - minimum wage for the 8 hours it must took so under a £ton!! I am astounded, its fcuking shit!!

i really hope we ditch Puma soon as every year their kits get shitter and shitter.

Rickler wrote:

Why are the top of the socks coloured grey?  They look awful.

They do look grey but they are green and white stripes but so narrow they appear to merge giving the grey effect

Away top is white.... again cause puma and argyle have no imagination cant wait to see the improvement on this years.

Angry wrote:

Away top is white.... again cause puma and argyle have no imagination  cant wait to see the improvement on this years.

For some reason the Avivas chose the away shirt more then they did the home shirts this season even though it was more disgusting.

We really need to ditch puma and get somebody like umbro on board.

If they're too expensive go for Macron or Admiral, need a change from this bullshit (Too reminiscent of the Brent era)

Graiser wrote:

Rickler wrote:

Why are the top of the socks coloured grey?  They look awful.

They do look grey but they are green and white stripes but so narrow they appear to merge giving the grey effect

Thanks.

Luckily I had a closer look and had covered my arse..

Rickler wrote:

To my eyes the hoop or band at the top of the socks is definitely 'grey' in appearance.  I think on closer inspection it might be an area of many small width hoops in black or green, but from a short distance they give a 'grey' appearance?  Who knows?  I don't really care as I don't like them.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I like it.

akagreengull wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I like it.

for a new shirt they are charging £40 plus for i except it to look alot different to the previous one.

akagreengull wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I like it.

You’re just trying to cause trouble!

Ps - I like it as well.

I measure my chest in inches....not in XXXX....so what is L...LX...LXX...etc

zyph wrote:

I measure my chest in inches....not in XXXX....so what is L...LX...LXX...etc

Plymouth and the West Country are so far behind the rest of the UK they are still using Roman Numerals.

mouldyoldgoat wrote:

zyph wrote:

I measure my chest in inches....not in XXXX....so what is L...LX...LXX...etc

Plymouth and the West Country are so far behind the rest of the UK they are still using Roman Numerals.

You can pick up a decent abacus from B&M, Saltash.

Tbh the shirt & shorts ain’t bad considered puma are shirt they use the same template just different colours & badge for most clubs that use em unless you say Like Arsenal few years back and any of the big client get to pick there one off design...by the way what were they thinking with them socks ffs lol

Agree about the socks Reg, having had another look at the funny border at the top.

Angry wrote:

akagreengull wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I like it.

for a new shirt they are charging £40 plus for i except it to look alot different to the previous one.

The whole football (and rugby) replica shirt industry is one complete rip off, from dubious manufacturing to fleecing the fans with inflated prices - but then people don't have to buy it.