FORECASTING LEAGUE

Time to get this off the ground again.  Resume of the rules, forecast the result of Argyles next game 1 point awarded for correct result, 3 points awarded for correct score, 1 point for each scorer, but you must have correct score first.  You do not have to name scorers.  Competition will be in 3 phases of 15 games.  3 phase winners plus best other will take part in end of season play off's.  First game Southend United (away) next Saturday.  Off you go then.

Shrimpers 2 Bleddyargo 1 [Harvey]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Wot, no school or dentist ?  

For the record the currant champion is Freathy, past winners :-

2009 ~ 10 Santacruz
2010 ~ 11 Tring Green
2011 ~ 12 Rickler

My forecast Southend 1 Argyle 0

Saaaaaafend 2-Argyle 2 Blizzard and Morgan

Sarfend 1 Arse-end 0

Argyle 2-1, Reid to score first.

Southend United 1 Plymouth Argyle 1 (Harvey)

Southend 2 Argyle 0

southend 2 argyle 1.

Southend 1 -1 Argo.

Hourihen

Hauihane

Conor.

southend 1 - argo 2, ist scorer morgan, reid( in off his big fat arse)

1 - 1

Southend 1 Argyle 2 Boco and Morgan. Don't think they will be as strong as last year.

pepsipete wrote:

Time to get this off the ground again.  Resume of the rules, forecast the result of Argyles next game 1 point awarded for correct result, 3 points awarded for correct score, 1 point for each scorer, but you must have correct score first.  You do not have to name scorers.  Competition will be in 3 phases of 15 games.  3 phase winners plus best other will take part in end of season play off's.  First game Southend United (away) next Saturday.  Off you go then.

You say one point for each scorer,but then you say you do not need to name scorers.How does that work?

Southend 3 - 1 Argiggle

greensleeves wrote:

pepsipete wrote:

Time to get this off the ground again.  Resume of the rules, forecast the result of Argyles next game 1 point awarded for correct result, 3 points awarded for correct score, 1 point for each scorer, but you must have correct score first.  You do not have to name scorers.  Competition will be in 3 phases of 15 games.  3 phase winners plus best other will take part in end of season play off's.  First game Southend United (away) next Saturday.  Off you go then.

You say one point for each scorer,but then you say you do not need to name scorers.How does that work?

I presume he means you don't have to put the scorer if you don't want to, as it'll only count if you get the exact score correct. Would make more sense to me to count correct scorers for all peeps.

Anyway. I think Southend will be gash this year under Phil Brown.

1v1 Wotton for Argo

greensleeves wrote:

pepsipete wrote:

Time to get this off the ground again.  Resume of the rules, forecast the result of Argyles next game 1 point awarded for correct result, 3 points awarded for correct score, 1 point for each scorer, but you must have correct score first.  You do not have to name scorers.  Competition will be in 3 phases of 15 games.  3 phase winners plus best other will take part in end of season play off's.  First game Southend United (away) next Saturday.  Off you go then.

You say one point for each scorer,but then you say you do not need to name scorers.How does that work?

You have to get the right score first (3 points)  then a bonus point available for each scorer named and ONLY the scorer(s), in the past people have named the whole team!  Thus you don't HAVE to bother with the scorers as you please and just accept the 3 points for the score.

can we name scorer for the other team?

And so the defence of my crown begins...

Southend 2-0 Argo

Phil's lot 0 - 1 John's lot. Morgan for us.

alannotivvy wrote:

can we name scorer for the other team?

Sometimes a special bonus is declared, when we play Exeter and Torquay for instance. The decision is mine alone.

brown 1 - 1 shez

Sarfend 0 Argo-nil 0

Pete ..thanks for that...so scorers only count if you predict the correct score and not the result...thats pretty tough in the normal course of events.very very few people are able to predict the correct score...and then only allowing those who predict the correct score to be the only ones who are then allowed to predict a scorer on top of that is even more tough...you've got too many rules I'm out..

greensleeves wrote:

Pete ..thanks for that...so scorers only count if you predict the correct score and not the result...thats pretty tough in the normal course of events.very very few people are able to predict the correct score...and then only allowing those who predict the correct score to be the only ones who are then allowed to predict a scorer on top of that is even more tough...you've got too many rules    I'm out..

Can't stand the heat?  

I think I would be right in saying that I didn't get even a result correct last season let alone a score.