Burton Sub

Played but wasn't on the team sheet !

Is that a fact?

So it says on the Burton official site.

@only1argyle put it out during game as well. Not sure what the penalties are tbh. Ref should've booked the player according to the rules and fourth official shouldn't have allowed him on the pitch.

Can't find rules about it on fa site.

Does that mean we win and get the points!?

Fletcher is a genius.

Definitley says in the Burton baggo report that Kee was not in the list of subs given to the press, but I guess it's the teamsheet given to the referee that counts?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

A desparate case of clutching at straws if ever I saw one.

This happened a few years back .... admin mistakes happen and there was a small punishment ... something like no sweets for a week. What really matters is players registered with the Football authorities... that is serious for obvious reasons.
If anybody out there is expecting to be given 3 points over some sort of football hanging chad, you will be a long time waiting. I expect clueless to be working on it though, rather than taking any training sessions or looking for mentoring..

Penzance wrote:

This happened a few years back .... admin mistakes happen and there was a small punishment ... something like no sweets for a week. What really matters is players registered with the Football authorities... that is serious for obvious reasons.
If anybody out there is expecting to be given 3 points over some sort of football hanging chad, you will be a long time waiting. I expect clueless to be working on it though, rather than taking any training sessions or looking for mentoring..

Quite, teams don't get given back points when the opposition have cheated.

If anything Burton would be docked points but that'd be it.

I'm sure if we asked nicely they would give the points to us.

Greenjock wrote:

Definitley says in the Burton baggo report that Kee was not in the list of subs given to the press, but I guess it's the teamsheet given to the referee that counts?

The team sheets that are given out at the grounds and hence to the press, are not the same as the offiial sheets that are countersigned by both clubs and the match referee.

I was at a game at AFC Wimbledon last season where there were only six subs named by them on the free hand out yet seven on the bench and the one that was missing from those team sheets was one of the ones who came on (and scored as it happened) I wouldn't get too excited about this if I were you.

merse wrote:

Greenjock wrote:

Definitley says in the Burton baggo report that Kee was not in the list of subs given to the press, but I guess it's the teamsheet given to the referee that counts?

The team sheets that are given out at the grounds and hence to the press, are not the same as the offiial sheets that are countersigned by both clubs and the match referee.

I was at a game at AFC Wimbledon last season where there were only six subs named by them on the free hand out yet seven on the bench and the one that was missing from those team sheets was one of the ones who came on (and scored as it happened) I wouldn't get too excited about this if I were you.

But it's about the only thing to get excited about at Argyle at the moment.